Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245046›Full record

ArticleRMD open2019

Development of one general and six country-specific algorithms to assess societal health utilities based on ASAS HI.

Ivette Essers, Mickael Hiligsmann, Uta Kiltz, Nick Bansback, Juergen Braun, Desirée van der Heijde, Annelies Boonen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health state utility values in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ivette EssersRheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9750-4429
Mickael HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Uta KiltzRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Nick BansbackSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Juergen BraunRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.
Desirée van der HeijdeRheumatology, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5781-158X
Annelies BoonenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, and the Caphri Research Institute Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Health utilities represent preference values that persons attach to health states. This study aims to develop one general and six country-specific algorithms to calculate societal preference values for health of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), as assessed by the disease-specific Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI). Methods: A survey was performed in random population samples from six European countries. In a best-worst choice experiment, subjects were asked to indicate repeatedly which of 4 random aspects of the 17-item ASAS HI was were most and least important. Bayesian analysis provided the relative importance of each of the 17 items. To rescale the relative importance scores on the absolute utility scale between 0 and 1, participants additionally completed two lead time trade-off experiments, one for 'severe SpA' and one for 'best health' without SpA. Six country-specific algorithms and one general algorithm were derived. The general algorithm was tested in 199 patients with axial SpA (axSpA). Results: 3039 subjects, mean age 47 years (SD 15) and 52% female completed the experiments. The population's health utility value for SpA varied between - 0.24 for 'worst' SpA (country range -0.35 to 0.03), and 0.88 for 'best' health (country range 0.81 to 0.90). Among 199 patients with axSpA, the mean utility was 0.36 (SD 0.30, range -0.24 to 0.88) and discriminated well between patients having high (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥ 4) or low (BASDAI < 4) disease activity (0.18 (SD 0.24) vs 0.51(SD 0.27), p<0.01). Conclusion: One general and six country-specific algorithms are available to convert scores from the ASAS HI into disease-specific societal utility values.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHealth StatusHealth Status IndicatorsModels, TheoreticalAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Factorsasas health indexsocietal utility valuespondyloarthritis

Identifiers

PMID31245046
PMCPMC6560676
OpenAlexW2945525123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.