Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245033›Full record

ReviewJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering

Wearable technologies for active living and rehabilitation: Current research challenges and future opportunities.

Mary M Rodgers, Gad Alon, Vinay M Pai, Richard S Conroy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05877183 ('Smart Reminder'), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05877183 naunknown statusnot on this map

'Smart Reminder': a Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of a Wearable Device to Provide Telerehabilitation for Persons With Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsStroke, Wearable DeviceArmsWearable device -'Smart Reminder', Sham device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary M RodgersDepartment of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-1071
Gad AlonDepartment of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vinay M PaiData Collaboratory, LLC, Potomac, MD, USA.
Richard S ConroyOffice of Strategic Coordination, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents some recent developments in the field of wearable sensors and systems that are relevant to rehabilitation and provides examples of systems with evidence supporting their effectiveness for rehabilitation. A discussion of current challenges and future developments for selected systems is followed by suggestions for future directions needed to advance towards wider deployment of wearable sensors and systems for rehabilitation.

Indexed as

augmented realityfunctional electrical stimulationinteractive feedbackrehabilitationsmart systems (rehabilitation)virtual realitywearable sensor systemsWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID31245033
PMCPMC6582279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.