Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31244992›Full record

Trial reportChiropractic & manual therapies2019

Effect of active TENS versus de-tuned TENS on walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Carlo Ammendolia, Pierre Côté, Y Raja Rampersaud, Danielle Southerst, Michael Schneider, Aksa Ahmed, Claire Bombardier, Gillian Hawker, Brian Budgell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02592642 (Self-Management to Improve Walking Ability in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02592642 nacompletednot on this map

Self-Management to Improve Walking Ability in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: the Evaluation of Four Novel Strategies.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled104ConditionsDegenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisArmsSelf-management Program, Workbook, Video, Pedometer, Instructional Workbook, Video, and Pedometer, Para-spinal TENS, Para-spinal Placebo TENS, Prototype Spinal Stenosis Belt
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlo Ammendolia1Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 60 Murray Street, Rm L2-225, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3L9 Canada.
Pierre Côté1Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 60 Murray Street, Rm L2-225, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3L9 Canada.
Y Raja RampersaudDepartment of Orthopedics, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, 441, 1 East Wing, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8 Canada.
Danielle Southerst6Occupational and Industrial Orthopaedic Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY 10014 USA.
Michael Schneider7Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA.
Aksa Ahmed2Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis & Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, 60 Murray Street, Rm L2-225, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3L9 Canada.
Claire Bombardier8Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE 3-805, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4 Canada.
Gillian Hawker8Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, 190 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE 3-805, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4 Canada.
Brian Budgell10Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, Ontario M2H 3J1 Canada.
University of Toronto · CACanadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAOrthopaedic Center · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background context: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads to diminished blood flow to the spinal nerves causing neurogenic claudication and impaired walking ability. Animal studies have demonstrated increased blood flow to the spinal nerves and spinal cord with superficial para-spinal electrical stimulation of the skin. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of active para-spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) compared to de-tuned TENS applied while walking, on improving walking ability in LSS. Study design: This was a two-arm double-blinded (participant and assessor) randomized controlled trial. Patient sample: We recruited 104 participants 50 years of age or older with neurogenic claudication, imaging confirmed LSS and limited walking ability. Outcome measures: The primary measure was walking distance measured by the self-paced walking test (SPWT) and the primary outcome was the difference in proportions among participants in both groups who achieved at least a 30% improvement in walking distance from baseline using relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. Methods: The active TENS group ( Results: From August 2014 to January 2016 a total of 640 potential participants were screened for eligibility; 106 were eligible and 104 were randomly allocated to active TENS or de-tuned TENS. Both groups showed significant improvement in walking distance but there was no significant difference between groups. The mean difference between active and de-tuned TENS groups was 46.9 m; 95% CI (- 118.4 to 212.1); Conclusions: Active TENS applied while walking is no better than de-tuned TENS for improving walking ability in patients with degenerative LSS and therefore should not be a recommended treatment in clinical practice. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02592642. Registration October 30, 2015.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpinal StenosisTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeWalkingIntermittent claudicationLumbar spinal stenosisNon-operative treatmentRandomized controlled trialTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Walking

Identifiers

PMID31244992
PMCPMC6582553
OpenAlexW2952942403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.