ReviewTheranostics2019
Research tools for extrapolating the disposition and pharmacokinetics of nanomaterials from preclinical animals to humans.
Review in Theranostics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Obtained by 'Green' Synthesis Biocompatible?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced biomaterial-based approaches for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Overcoming the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer's disease: translational perspectives on advanced drug delivery platforms.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Nanoscale Approaches to Oro-Dental Tissue Engineering: A Review of Strategies, Composites, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Decoding the Kruppel-like Transcription Factors in Atherosclerosis: Insight from Molecular and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Radiopharmaceutical kit to prepare Copper-64 labelled porphyrin-lipid nanoparticles for radiotracer imaging studies in cancer patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Understanding the Interplay Between Bacterial Biofilm and Antimicrobial Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pharmacometric modeling of lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA therapeutics and vaccines: A systematic review.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for non-surgical periodontal therapy: innovations and clinical applications.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-based encapsulation of biochemicals for targeted sepsis therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Perspective on Nano-Enabled Photostimulation Biointerfaces.ACS nano · 2025Review
- Exemplifying interspecies variation of liposomeActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Article
- Predicting tissue distribution and tumor delivery of nanoparticles in mice using machine learning models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024Article
- Advances in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Nanomaterials.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- Advances in hybridized nanoarchitectures for improved oro-dental health.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Improving ADMET Prediction Accuracy for Candidate Drugs: Factors to Consider in QSPR Modeling Approaches.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Article
- Nonclinical pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of VSV-GP using methods to decouple input drug disposition and viral replication.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023Article
- Bench-to-bedside: Feasibility of nano-engineered and drug-delivery biomaterials for bone-anchored implants and periodontal applications.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public's health.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A critical step in the translational science of nanomaterials from preclinical animal studies to humans is the comprehensive investigation of their disposition (or ADME) and pharmacokinetic behaviours. Disposition and pharmacokinetic data are ideally collected in different animal species (rodent and nonrodent), at different dose levels, and following multiple administrations. These data are used to assess the systemic exposure and effect to nanomaterials, primary determinants of their potential toxicity and therapeutic efficacy. At toxic doses in animal models, pharmacokinetic (termed toxicokinetic) data are related to toxicologic findings that inform the design of nonclinical toxicity studies and contribute to the determination of the maximum recommended starting dose in clinical phase 1 trials. Nanomaterials present a unique challenge for disposition and pharmacokinetic investigations owing to their prolonged circulation times, nonlinear pharmacokinetic profiles, and their extensive distribution into tissues. Predictive relationships between nanomaterial physicochemical properties and behaviours in vivo are lacking and are confounded by anatomical, physiological, and immunological differences amongst preclinical animal models and humans. These challenges are poorly understood and frequently overlooked by investigators, leading to inaccurate assumptions of disposition, pharmacokinetic, and toxicokinetics profiles across species that can have profoundly detrimental impacts for nonclinical toxicity studies and clinical phase 1 trials. Herein are highlighted two research tools for analysing and interpreting disposition and pharmacokinetic data from multiple species and for extrapolating this data accurately in humans. Empirical methodologies and mechanistic mathematical modelling approaches are discussed with emphasis placed on important considerations and caveats for representing nanomaterials, such as the importance of integrating physiological variables associated with the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) into extrapolation methods for nanomaterials. The application of these tools will be examined in recent examples of investigational and clinically approved nanomaterials. Finally, strategies for applying these extrapolation tools in a complementary manner to perform dose predictions and in silico toxicity assessments in humans will be explained. A greater familiarity with the available tools and prior experiences of extrapolating nanomaterial disposition and pharmacokinetics from preclinical animal models to humans will hopefully result in a more straightforward roadmap for the clinical translation of promising nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.