Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31244860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Costimulatory Molecules and Immune Checkpoints Are Differentially Expressed on Different Subsets of Dendritic Cells.

Claudia Carenza, Francesca Calcaterra, Ferdinando Oriolo, Clara Di Vito, Marta Ubezio, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, Domenico Mavilio, Silvia Della Bella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Myelin-reactive CD8Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia CarenzaDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesca CalcaterraDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ferdinando OrioloDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Clara Di VitoLab of Clinical and Experimental Immunology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Marta UbezioCancer Center, Humanitas Reserach Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Matteo Giovanni Della PortaCancer Center, Humanitas Reserach Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Domenico MavilioDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Silvia Della BellaDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role in initiating and shaping immune responses. The effects of DCs on adaptive immune responses depend partly on functional specialization of distinct DC subsets, and partly on the activation state of DCs, which is largely dictated by environmental signals. Fully activated immunostimulatory DCs express high levels of costimulatory molecules, produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, and stimulate T cell proliferation, whereas tolerogenic DCs express low levels of costimulatory molecules, produce immunomodulatory cytokines and impair T cell proliferation. Relevant to the increasing use of immune checkpoint blockade in cancer treatment, signals generated from inhibitory checkpoint molecules on DC surface may also contribute to the inhibitory properties of tolerogenic DCs. Yet, our knowledge on the expression of inhibitory molecules on human DC subsets is fragmentary. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the expression of three immune checkpoints on peripheral blood DC subsets, in basal conditions and upon exposure to pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory stimuli, by using a flow cytometric panel that allows a direct comparison of the activatory/inhibitory phenotype of DC-lineage and inflammatory DC subsets. We demonstrated that functionally distinct DC subsets are characterized by differential expression of activatory and inhibitory molecules, and that cDC1s in particular are endowed with a unique immune checkpoint repertoire characterized by high TIM-3 expression, scarce PD-L1 expression and lack of ILT2. Notably, this unique cDC1 repertoire was subverted in a group of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes included in the study. Applied to the characterization of DCs in the tumor microenvironment, this panel has the potential to provide valuable information to be used for investigating the role of DC subsets in cancer, guiding DC-targeting treatments, and possibly identifying predictive biomarkers for clinical response to cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDB7-H1 AntigenCell LineageCytokinesDendritic CellsFemaleFlow CytometryHealthy VolunteersHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2HumansInflammation MediatorsLeukocyte Immunoglobulin-like Receptor B1Antigens, CDB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanCytokinesHAVCR2 protein, humanHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2Inflammation MediatorsLeukocyte Immunoglobulin-like Receptor B1LILRB1 protein, humanconventional cDC1 dendritic cellsconventional cDC2 dendritic cellsILT2immune checkpointmyelodysplastic syndromesPD-L1plasmacytoid dendritic cellsTIM-3

Identifiers

PMID31244860
PMCPMC6579930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.