ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2019
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Published Physiologically-based Kinetic Models and an Assessment of their Chemical Space Coverage.Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA · 2021Pooled it
- Guidance on the use of read-across for chemical safety assessment in food and feed.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Screening for Endocrine Bioactivity Potential of Tobacco Product Chemicals Including Flavor Chemicals.Environmental toxicology · 2025Article
- Article
- The TOXIN knowledge graph: supporting animal-free risk assessment of cosmetics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development.ADMET & DMPK · 2025Review
- Article
- Towards Precision Ecotoxicology: Leveraging Evolutionary Conservation of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Product Targets to Understand Adverse Outcomes Across Species and Life Stages.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2024Review
- iGEM as a human iPS cell-based global epigenetic modulation detection assay provides throughput characterization of chemicals affecting DNA methylation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning disciplines with the potential to improve the nanotoxicology and nanomedicine fields: a comprehensive review.Archives of toxicology · 2023Review
- Substantiate a read-across hypothesis by using transcriptome data-A case study on volatile diketones.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Article
- Maximizing the Performance of Similarity-Based Virtual Screening Methods by Generating Synergy from the Integration of 2D and 3D Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integratesComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- IVIVE: Facilitating the Use ofToxics · 2022Review
- Towards a qAOP framework for predictive toxicology - Linking data to decisions.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparativeEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
- Strategies to identify candidate repurposable drugs: COVID-19 treatment as a case example.Translational psychiatry · 2021Review
- Leveraging high-throughput screening data, deep neural networks, and conditional generative adversarial networks to advance predictive toxicology.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Interdisciplinary data science to advance environmental health research and improve birth outcomes.Environmental research · 2021Article
- Gaining acceptance in next generation PBK modelling approaches for regulatory assessments - An OECD international effort.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A plethora of databases exist online that can assist in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.