Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31244305›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

A Cross-sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitude and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Cancer Survivors.

Yiqing Huang, Yu Yang Soon, Lay Poh Ngo, Ying Hui Dina Ee, Bee Choo Tai, Hung Chew Wong, Soo Chin Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiqing HuangDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore. Email: soo_chin_lee@nuhs.edu.sg
Yu Yang SoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
Lay Poh NgoDivision of Oncology Nursing, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
Ying Hui Dina EeUniversity Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Bee Choo TaiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Hung Chew WongBiostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore.
Soo Chin LeeDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore. Email: soo_chin_lee@nuhs.edu.sg
National University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNational University Health System · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding behaviour of cancer survivors is imperative as they are at risk of recurrence or second cancers. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers globally. We aim to determine the uptake rate, barriers and predictors of CRC screening among cancer survivors. Methods: Within a public hospital in Singapore, 150 non-CRC survivors were enrolled. Questionnaire on knowledge, screening behaviour, motivators and barriers towards CRC screening was administered. Results: Majority were survivors of breast (69.3%), prostate (7.3%), endometrial (4%) and ovarian (4%) cancers. More than half had high knowledge scores for CRC symptoms, screening tests and risk factors. About a third had received physician’s recommendation on CRC screening. Approximately half had undergone screening. The most common barriers to CRC screening were lack of symptoms and physician’s recommendation. Cancer survivors with higher education, higher household income, family history and those who perceived “great need” or “some need” were more likely to have undergone screening (56.4% vs 30.6%, p=0.003; 62.2% vs 41.9%, p=0.022; 70.6% vs 45.1%, p=0.048; 70.8% vs 27.4%, p<0.001). Physician’s recommendation (76.4% vs 31.6%, p<0.001) and high CRC symptom knowledge (55.8% vs 34.5%, p=0.012) were associated with increased likelihood of screening.On multivariate analysis, physician’s recommendation, higher household income and survivors’ perceived need to undergo screening remained strong predictors for CRC screening (p<0.001; p=0.010; p<0.001). Conclusion: The uptake rate of CRC screening among non-CRC survivors was modest. Physicians need to be more active in discussing CRC screening with cancer survivors as part of the survivorship care plan.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedCancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ParticipationPrognosisRisk FactorsSingaporeBarrierscolorectal cancerMotivatorsScreeningsurvivors

Identifiers

PMID31244305
PMCPMC7021622
OpenAlexW2948219937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.