Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31244301›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Metastatic Neck Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer: A Sample of Iranian Patient.

Fatemeh Alamolhoda, Fariborz Faeghi, Mohsen Bakhshandeh, Aslan Ahmadi, Morteza Sanei Taheri, Sahar Aabbasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh AlamolhodaDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: f_faeghi@sbmu.ac.ir
Fariborz FaeghiDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: f_faeghi@sbmu.ac.ir
Mohsen BakhshandehDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: f_faeghi@sbmu.ac.irORCID 0000-0002-6546-7483
Aslan AhmadiEar Nose Throat (ENT) and Head and Neck Surgery Research Center, Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Morteza Sanei TaheriDepartment of Radiology, Shohada-E-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar AabbasiDepartment of Radiology, Shohada-E-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of DWI in assessment of metastatic neck lymph node in a sample of Iranian patients with Head and Neck cancer. Methods: 25 patients with 80 neck lymph nodes were analyzed using 1.5 T MRI. DWI was performed with b values of 0 and 1,000 s/mm2. Short axis diameter and ADC values (min, max and mean) were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic neck LNs and results were compared with histopathological findings. The optimal ADC thresholds were analyzed using receiver coefficient characteristic (ROC) curves for discriminating between metastatic and benign neck lymph nodes. Result: Histopathological findings revealed that there are 45% (n=36) metastatic and 55% (n=44) non-metastatic neck LNs respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in short axis diameter between the two groups (p = 0.346). However, The ADC values of metastatic neck LNs were significantly lower than those of non-metastatic neck LNs (p < 0.001); 0.90 ± 0.10 × 10-3 mm2/s vs 1.06 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s ( ADC mean ), 0.78 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s vs 0.92 ± 0.20× 10-3 mm2/s ( ADC min ) and 1.02 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s vs 1.24 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s (ADC max ). The optimal mean ADC threshold value was equal to 0.996 × 10-3 mm2/s for differentiating malignant from benign lymph nodes with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 80.56 %, 77.27 % and 71.59 % respectively. Conclusion: MR diffusion imaging and ADC values as a non-invasive technique can assess metastatic neck LNs in head and neck cancer with higher sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIranLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProspective StudiesROC Curvehead and neck cancerKeywords: DWI-MRIMetastasisneck lymph nodes

Identifiers

PMID31244301
PMCPMC7021623
OpenAlexW2954104171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.