ArticleCurrent microbiology2019
Identification of Novel Endophytic Yeast Strains from Tangerine Peel.
Article in Current microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity of duckweed (AIMS microbiology · 2023Article
- Diversity of Endophytic Yeasts from Agricultural Fruits Positive for Phytohormone IAA Production.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022Article
- Volatile organic compounds produced byFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Fungal pathogens causing postharvest fruit rot of wolfberry and inhibitory effect of 2,3-butanedione.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Tangerine, banana and pomegranate peels valorisation for sustainable environment: A review.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Review
- A potentially important resource: endophytic yeasts.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Seven endophytic yeast strains were isolated from tangerine peel (Citrus reticulata Blanco) and genotyped through clustering with D1/D2 and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences from GenBank. Phenotypic characteristics were obtained through commercial kits and through assisted species identification. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by the yeast strains was assessed using Salkowski reagent and High-Performance Liquid chromatography (HPLC). The growth-promoting effects of the yeast were evaluated using the 'ragdoll' method. CRYb1, CRYb2 and CRYb7 isolates were identified as the closest species Hanseniaspora opuntiae. CRYb3 was identified as Pichia kluyveri. CRYb4, CRYb5 and CRYb6 were identified as Meyerozyma guilliermondii. CRYb1, CRYb5, CRYb6 and CRYb7 were found to be capable of IAA production. The most promising yeast strains now require further evaluation for their ability to promote plant growth in vitro and in vivo. These data increase our knowledge of the distribution and biological properties of endophytic yeast. This is important information that will be required to fully harness the growth-promoting properties of yeast strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.