ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2020
[Modular arthrodesis system TITAN (KAM-TITAN) after failed revision total knee arthroplasty : Operative technique and clinical experience].
Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Knee Arthrodesis with a Modular Silver-Coated Endoprosthesis for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty with Extensive Bone Loss: A Retrospective Case-Series Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Application of 3D Printing-Assisted Articulating Spacer in Two-Stage Revision Surgery for Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.BioMed research international · 2021Observational
- [Knee revision arthroplasty-a increasing challenge].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2020Article
- Two-Stage Modular Intramedullary Knee Arthrodesis for Persistent Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mid-Term to Long-Term Outcomes.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRestoration of a painless, weight-bearing extremity with a modular knee arthrodesis system based on a cementless modular revision stem for rotationally stable, diaphyseal anchorage. INDICATIONS: Severe bone loss and compromised soft tissue after failed total knee arthroplasty, two-stage revisions and non-reconstructible knee extensor mechanism deficiency. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Extensive osteolysis preventing diaphyseal anchorage of the prosthesis. Contralateral arthrodesis of the knee joint and/or ipsilateral arthrodesis of the hip joint and contralateral lower extremity amputation. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: In revision cases, removal of the total knee arthroplasty, spacer, the bone cement and all intramedullary granulation tissue. Reaming the medullary cavity with intramedullary reamers to cortical contact. Restoring leg length and rotation with trial implants. After implantation of the femoral and tibial stems, placing and tensioning of the rotationally aligned coupling elements. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilization on two forearm crutches from postoperative day 1. Removal of the Redon drains after 48 h. Partial weight bearing of 20 kg for 6 weeks postoperatively. If plain radiographs show unchanged seating of the prosthesis after 6 weeks, loading can be increased by 10 kg per week until full weight bearing is achieved.
resultsBetween 2007 and 2012 clinical data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. A total of 27 patients had been treated within a two-stage exchange procedure with implantation of a modular intramedullary arthodesis nail TITAN (KAM-TITAN). The mean follow-up was 30.9 ± 12.0 months. A functional evaluation was performed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The analyzed patients showed a mean score of 39.2 ± 8.3. To determine the pain level the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain was used and showed a mean score of 2.9 ± 1.3. The rate of definitely free of infection (using Laffer criteria) at last follow-up was 85.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31243472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.