Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31243457›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2019

Rethinking collaboration: developing a learning platform to address under-five mortality in Mpumalanga province, South Africa.

Lucia D'Ambruoso, Maria van der Merwe, Oghenebrume Wariri, Peter Byass, Gerhard Goosen, Kathleen Kahn, Sparara Masinga, Victoria Mokoena, Barry Spies, Stephen Tollman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lucia D'AmbruosoCentre for Global Development and Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Maria van der MerweCentre for Global Development and Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Oghenebrume WaririCentre for Global Development and Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Peter ByassCentre for Global Development and Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Gerhard GoosenMpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, South Africa.
Kathleen KahnDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sparara MasingaMpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, South Africa.
Victoria MokoenaMpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, South Africa.
Barry SpiesMpumalanga Department of Health, Nelspruit, South Africa.
Stephen TollmanDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sophie WitterInstitute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Rhian TwineMRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N005597/1Medical Research Council MR/P014844/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following 50 years of apartheid, South Africa introduced visionary health policy committing to the right to health as part of a primary health care (PHC) approach. Implementation is seriously challenged, however, in an often-dysfunctional health system with scarce resources and a complex burden of avoidable mortality persists. Our aim was to develop a process generating evidence of practical relevance on implementation processes among people excluded from access to health systems. Informed by health policy and systems research, we developed a collaborative learning platform in which we worked as co-researchers with health authorities in a rural province. This article reports on the process and insights brought by health systems stakeholders. Evidence gaps on under-five mortality were identified with a provincial Directorate after which we collected quantitative and qualitative data. We applied verbal autopsy to quantify levels, causes and circumstances of deaths and participatory action research to gain community perspectives on the problem and priorities for action. We then re-convened health systems stakeholders to analyse and interpret these data through which several systems issues were identified as contributory to under-five deaths: staff availability and performance; service organization and infrastructure; multiple parallel initiatives; and capacity to address social determinants. Recommendations were developed ranging from immediate low- and no-cost re-organization of services to those where responses from higher levels of the system or outside were required. The process was viewed as acceptable and relevant for an overburdened system operating 'in the dark' in the absence of local data. Institutional infrastructure for evidence-based decision-making does not exist in many health systems. We developed a process connecting research evidence on rural health priorities with the means for action and enabled new partnerships between communities, authorities and researchers. Further development is planned to understand potential in deliberative processes for rural PHC.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PolicyAutopsyChild MortalityChild, PreschoolHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant MortalityPrimary Health CareRural HealthSouth Africahealth policy and systems researchparticipatory action researchSouth Africaunder-five mortalityverbal autopsy

Identifiers

PMID31243457
PMCPMC6736195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.