Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31243376›Full record

ArticleNature2019

Author Correction: Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity.

Jarosław M Granda, Liva Donina, Vincenza Dragone, De-Liang Long, Leroy Cronin

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jarosław M GrandaSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Liva DoninaSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Vincenza DragoneSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
De-Liang LongSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Leroy CroninSchool of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. L.Cronin@chem.gla.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Change history: Owing to the misidentification of compound 22 in the original Letter, changes have been made to Fig. 5, Extended Data Fig. 2 and the main text; see accompanying Amendment.

Identifiers

PMID31243376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.