ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2020
Current stepwise recommendations for hypogonadism screening in erectile dysfunction are not cost-effective.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can we rely on total testosterone measurement to exclude hypogonadism in erectile dysfunction?International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypogonadism is a prevalent comorbidity with erectile disfunction (ED) and current guidelines recommend screening for hypogonadism with total testosterone (TT). If low TT is detected, further assessment with LH and SHBG plus albumin are needed to establish an etiology and treatment. Our primary objective was to determine the cost benefit of current stepwise approach versus ad initium full hormonal assessment. Two hundred consecutive male patients referred for ED were screened after consent and 81 were included and assessed for hypogonadism according to the current stepwise approach with TT, and only if TT was less than 345 ng/mL, a full hormonal assessment with TT, LH, and SHBG plus albumin to calculate free testosterone was performed. Direct costs were calculated using the national public healthcare system reimbursement tables and were compared with a hypothetical initial full hormonal assessment. Screening TT was less than 345 ng/mL in 34.6% patients leading to a full hormonal assessment on these. Using a stepwise approach there was a direct cost increase of 5.82 € per patient. Moreover, one out of every three patients had two extra venipunctures and an additional follow-up appointment. Current stepwise recommendations may prove costly in high prevalence scenarios such as the ED subpopulation as a direct cost increase was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.