ArticleScientific reports2019
Characterization of four functional biocompatible pressure-sensitive adhesives for rapid prototyping of cell-based lab-on-a-chip and organ-on-a-chip systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- A 3D microfluidic model of exchange between perfused blood and lymphatic microvascular networks.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Exploiting Device Deformability for Fluid and Particle Manipulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Flow Injection-Based Refractive Index Sensing with a SiACS applied optical materials · 2025Article
- Paper-Based Electroanalysis for Emerging Pollutant Detection.ACS electrochemistry · 2025Review
- Release, Transfer, Fold: Using a Silicone Adhesive for On-Demand 3D Tissue Engineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Transformation gap from research findings to large-scale commercialized products in microfluidic field.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Cell Migration Assays and Their Application to Wound Healing Assays-A Critical Review.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Review
- The Path from Nasal Tissue to Nasal Mucosa on Chip: Part 2-Advanced Microfluidic Nasal In Vitro Model for Drug Absorption Testing.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Liver-on-a-chip: Considerations, advances, and beyond.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Review
- The Fabrication and Bonding of Thermoplastic Microfluidics: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Dynamic Observation of Retinal Response to Pressure Elevation in a Microfluidic Chamber.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Bonding Strategies for Thermoplastics Applicable for Bioanalysis and Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Tissue Barrier-on-Chip: A Technology for Reproducible Practice in Drug Testing.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- A More Biomimetic Cell Migration Assay with High Reliability and Its Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Thermoplastic Microfluidic Bonding.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Additive Manufacturing and 3D Bioprinting for Organs-On-A-Chip and Microphysiological Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Aortic valve cell microenvironment: Considerations for developing a valve-on-chip.Biophysics reviews · 2021Review
- Design and Fabrication of Organ-on-Chips: Promises and Challenges.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Sorption of Neuropsychopharmaca in Microfluidic Materials forACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the advent of affordable photo- and soft-lithography using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), low cost multi-step microfabrication methods have become available to a broad scientific community today. Although these methods are frequently applied for microfluidic prototype production in academic and industrial settings, fast design iterations and rapid prototyping within a few minutes with a high degree of flexibility are nearly impossible. To reduce microfluidic concept-to-chip time and costs, a number of alternative rapid prototyping techniques have recently been introduced including CNC micromachining, 3D printing and plotting out of numeric CAD designs as well as micro-structuring of thin PDMS sheets and pressure sensitive adhesives. Although micro-structuring of pressure sensitive adhesives promises high design flexibility, rapid fabrication and simple biochip assembly, most adhesives are toxic for living biological systems. Since an appropriate bio-interface and proper biology-material interaction is key for any cell chip and organ-on-a-chip system, only a limited number of medical-grade materials are available for microfluidic prototyping. In this study, we have characterized four functional biomedical-grade pressure sensitive adhesives for rapid prototyping (e.g. less than 1 hour) applications including structuring precision, physical and optical properties as well as biocompatibilities. While similar biocompatibility was found for all four adhesives, significant differences in cutting behavior, bonding strength to glass and polymers as well as gas permeability was observed. Practical applications included stability testing of multilayered, membrane-integrated organ-on-a-chip devices under standard cell culture conditions (e.g. 2-3 weeks at 37 °C and 100% humidity) and a shear-impact up to 5 dynes/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.