Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31243310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A preliminary examination of bacterial, archaeal, and fungal communities inhabiting different rhizocompartments of tomato plants under real-world environments.

Shin Ae Lee, Yiseul Kim, Jeong Myeong Kim, Bora Chu, Jae-Ho Joa, Mee Kyung Sang, Jaekyeong Song, Hang-Yeon Weon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shin Ae LeeAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea.
Yiseul KimAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea.
Jeong Myeong KimAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea.
Bora ChuAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea.
Jae-Ho JoaResearch Institute of Climate Change and Agriculture, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Jeju, 63240, South Korea.
Mee Kyung SangAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea.
Jaekyeong SongAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea.
Hang-Yeon WeonAgricultural Microbiology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Wanju, 55365, South Korea. why@korea.kr.
Rural Development Administration · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant microbiota is a key determinant of plant health and productivity. The composition and structure of plant microbiota varies according to plant tissue and compartment, which are specific habitats for microbial colonization. To investigate the structural composition of the microbiome associated with tomato roots under natural systems, we characterized the bacterial, archaeal, and fungal communities of three belowground compartments (rhizosphere, endosphere, and bulk soil) of tomato plants collected from 23 greenhouses in 7 geographic locations of South Korea. The microbial diversity and structure varied by rhizocompartment, with the most distinctive community features found in the endosphere. The bacterial and fungal communities in the bulk soil and rhizosphere were correlated with soil physicochemical properties, such as pH, electrical conductivity, and exchangeable cation levels, while this trend was not evident in the endosphere samples. A small number of core bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) present in all samples from the rhizosphere and endosphere represented more than 60% of the total relative abundance. Among these core microbes, OTUs belonging to the genera Acidovorax, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Streptomyces, and Variovorax, members of which are known to have beneficial effects on plant growth, were more relatively abundant in the endosphere samples. A co-occurrence network analysis indicated that the microbial community in the rhizosphere had a larger and more complex network than those in the bulk soil and endosphere. The analysis also identified keystone taxa that might play important roles in microbe-microbe interactions in the community. Additionally, profiling of predicted gene functions identified many genes associated with membrane transport in the endospheric and rhizospheric communities. Overall, the data presented here provide preliminary insight into bacterial, archaeal, and fungal phylogeny, functionality, and interactions in the rhizocompartments of tomato roots under real-world environments.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaMicrobiotaAlgorithmsArchaeaBiodiversityCationsComputational BiologyEcosystemElectric ConductivityFungiGeographyHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPlant RootsRepublic of KoreaRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCationsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31243310
PMCPMC6594962
OpenAlexW2954733434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.