Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31243141›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2019

From observing to predicting single-cell structure and function with high-throughput/high-content microscopy.

Anatole Chessel, Rafael E Carazo Salas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lessons in Organic Fluorescent Probe Discovery.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anatole ChesselÉcole polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France.
Rafael E Carazo SalasSchool of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD Bristol, UK rafael.carazosalas@bristol.ac.uk anatole.chessel@polytechnique.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-3981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 15 years, cell-based microscopy has evolved its focus from observing cell function to aiming to predict it. In particular-powered by breakthroughs in computer vision, large-scale image analysis and machine learning-high-throughput and high-content microscopy imaging have enabled to uniquely harness single-cell information to systematically discover and annotate genes and regulatory pathways, uncover systems-level interactions and causal links between cellular processes, and begin to clarify and predict causal cellular behaviour and decision making. Here we review these developments, discuss emerging trends in the field, and describe how single-cell 'omics and single-cell microscopy are imminently in an intersecting trajectory. The marriage of these two fields will make possible an unprecedented understanding of cell and tissue behaviour and function.

Indexed as

CellsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMachine LearningMicroscopySingle-Cell Analysiscausal cell behaviourgene regulatory networksgenome-wide screeninghigh-content microscopyhigh-throughput microscopyMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID31243141
PMCPMC6610450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.