Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31243078›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Development of a CRISPR/Cas9-Based Tool for Gene Deletion in

Vinh G Tran, Mingfeng Cao, Zia Fatma, Xiaofei Song, Huimin Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A versatile genetic toolkit for engineeringFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic engineering of low-pH-tolerant non-model yeast,Metabolic engineering communications · 2023
    Article
  17. Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Engineering robust microorganisms for organic acid production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vinh G Tran *Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Mingfeng Cao *Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Zia FatmaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Xiaofei SongDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Huimin ZhaoDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA zhao5@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonconventional yeast

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene DeletionGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesPlasmidsPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomycetalesCRISPR/Cas9genome editingIssatchenkia orientalismetabolic engineeringsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID31243078
PMCPMC6595149
OpenAlexW2954420967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.