Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31243034›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Healthcare provision, functional ability and quality of life after proximal femoral fracture - 'ProFem': Study protocol of a population-based, prospective study based on individually linked survey and statutory health insurance data.

Silke Andrich, Michaela Ritschel, Gabriele Meyer, Falk Hoffmann, Astrid Stephan, Marion Baltes, Juliane Blessin, Kathrin Jobski, Alexander M Fassmer, Burkhard Haastert and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Silke AndrichInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8884-7465
Michaela RitschelInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gabriele MeyerMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Falk HoffmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.
Astrid StephanMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Marion BaltesMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Juliane BlessinMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Health and Nursing Sciences, Medical Faculty, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Kathrin JobskiDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.
Alexander M FassmerDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.
Burkhard HaastertInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Veronika GontscharukInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Werner ArendInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lena TheunissenInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Denise ColleyInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Raoul HinzeInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Simon ThelenDepartment of Trauma and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany.
Petra FuhrmannDepartment Health Policy - Health Economics - Press Relations, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian G G SorgDepartment Health Policy - Health Economics - Press Relations, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Joachim WindolfDepartment of Trauma and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christoph J RupprechtDepartment Health Policy - Health Economics - Press Relations, AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProximal femoral fractures (PFF) are among the most frequent fractures in older people. However, the situation of people with a PFF after hospital discharge is poorly understood. Our aim is to (1) analyse healthcare provision, (2) examine clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), (3) describe clinical and sociodemographic predictors of these and (4) develop an algorithm to identify subgroups with poor outcomes and a potential need for more intensive healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a population-based prospective study based on individually linked survey and statutory health insurance (SHI) data. All people aged minimum 60 years who have been continuously insured with the AOK Rheinland/Hamburg and experience a PFF within 1 year will be consecutively included (SHI data analysis). Additionally, 700 people selected randomly from the study population will be consecutively invited to participate in the survey. Questionnaire data will be collected in the participants' private surroundings at 3, 6 and 12 months after hospital discharge. If the insured person considers themselves to be only partially or not at all able to take part in the survey, a proxy person will be interviewed where possible. SHI variables include healthcare provision, healthcare costs and clinical outcomes. Questionnaire variables include information on PROs, lifestyle characteristics and socioeconomic status. We will use multiple regression models to estimate healthcare processes and outcomes including mortality and cost, investigate predictors, perform non-responder analysis and develop an algorithm to identify vulnerable subgroups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf (approval reference 6128R). All participants including proxies providing written and informed consent can withdraw from the study at any time. The study findings will be disseminated through scientific journals and public information. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00012554.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedFemaleFemoral FracturesGermanyHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairesdata linkagehealthcare provisionpatient-reported outcomesproximal femoral fracture

Identifiers

PMID31243034
PMCPMC6597653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.