Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242865›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Comparative analyses of chloroplast genomes from 22 Lythraceae species: inferences for phylogenetic relationships and genome evolution within Myrtales.

Cuihua Gu, Li Ma, Zhiqiang Wu, Kai Chen, Yixiang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chloroplast genomes in sevenFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  13. Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative chloroplast genome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  17. The chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  18. Backbone phylogeny and adaptive evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. The complete chloroplast genome of a fast-growing treeMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cuihua GuSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China. gucuihua@zafu.edu.cn.
Li MaSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Zhiqiang WuDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Kai ChenSchool of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Yixiang WangSchool of Environment and Resources, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Zhejiang A & F University · CNColorado State University · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31770681, 31370641)Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LY17C160003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLythraceae belongs to the order Myrtales, which is part of Archichlamydeae. The family has 31 genera containing approximately 620 species of herbs, shrubs and trees. Of these 31 genera, five large genera each possess 35 or more species. They are Lythrum, with 35; Rotala, with 45; Nesaea, with 50; Lagerstroemia, with 56; and Cuphea, with 275 species.

resultsWe reported six newly sequenced chloroplast (cp) genomes (Duabanga grandiflora, Trapa natans, Lythrum salicaria, Lawsonia inermis, Woodfordia fruticosa and Rotala rotundifolia) and compared them with 16 other cp genomes of Lythraceae species. The cp genomes of the 22 Lythraceae species ranged in length from 152,049 bp to 160,769 bp. In each Lythraceae species, the cp genome contained 112 genes consisting of 78 protein coding genes, four ribosomal RNAs and 30 transfer RNAs. Furthermore, we detected 211-332 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in six categories and 7-27 long repeats in four categories. We selected ten divergent hotspots (ndhF, matK, ycf1, rpl22, rpl32, trnK-rps16, trnR-atpA, rpl32-trnL, trnH-psbA and trnG-trnR) among the 22 Lythraceae species to be potential molecular markers. We constructed phylogenetic trees from 42 Myrtales plants with 8 Geraniales plants as out groups. The relationships among the Myrtales species were effectively distinguished by maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian inference (BI) trees constructed using 66 protein coding genes. Generally, the 22 Lythraceae species gathered into one clade, which was resolved as sister to the three Onagraceae species. Compared with Melastomataceae and Myrtaceae, Lythraceae and Onagraceae differentiated later within Myrtales.

conclusionsThe study provided ten potential molecular markers as candidate DNA barcodes and contributed cp genome resources within Myrtales for further study.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastGenome, PlantLythraceaePhylogenySequence AlignmentChloroplast genomeLythraceaeMyrtalesPhylogenomic

Identifiers

PMID31242865
PMCPMC6595698
OpenAlexW2955015941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.