Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242854›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

The effect of breed and diet type on the global transcriptome of hepatic tissue in beef cattle divergent for feed efficiency.

Marc G Higgins, David A Kenny, Claire Fitzsimons, Gordon Blackshields, Séan Coyle, Clare McKenna, Mark McGee, Derek W Morris, Sinéad M Waters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marc G HigginsDiscipline of Biochemistry, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
David A KennyAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Claire FitzsimonsLivestock Systems Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Gordon BlackshieldsAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Séan CoyleLivestock Systems Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Clare McKennaAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Mark McGeeLivestock Systems Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Derek W MorrisDiscipline of Biochemistry, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Sinéad M WatersAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland. sinead.waters@teagasc.ie.

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine 13/S/519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeed efficiency is an important economic and environmental trait in beef production, which can be measured in terms of residual feed intake (RFI). Cattle selected for low-RFI (feed efficient) have similar production levels but decreased feed intake, while also emitting less methane. RFI is difficult and expensive to measure and is not widely adopted in beef production systems. However, development of DNA-based biomarkers for RFI may facilitate its adoption in genomic-assisted breeding programmes. Cattle have been shown to re-rank in terms of RFI across diets and age, while also RFI varies by breed. Therefore, we used RNA-Seq technology to investigate the hepatic transcriptome of RFI-divergent Charolais (CH) and Holstein-Friesian (HF) steers across three dietary phases to identify genes and biological pathways associated with RFI regardless of diet or breed.

resultsResidual feed intake was measured during a high-concentrate phase, a zero-grazed grass phase and a final high-concentrate phase. In total, 322 and 33 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified across all diets for CH and HF steers, respectively. Three genes, GADD45G, HP and MID1IP1, were differentially expressed in CH when both the high-concentrate zero-grazed grass diet were offered. Two canonical pathways were enriched across all diets for CH steers. These canonical pathways were related to immune function.

conclusionsThe absence of common differentially expressed genes across all dietary phases and breeds in this study supports previous reports of the re-ranking of animals in terms of RFI when offered differing diets over their lifetime. However, we have identified biological processes such as the immune response and lipid metabolism as potentially associated with RFI divergence emphasising the previously reported roles of these biological processes with respect to RFI.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietGene Expression ProfilingRed MeatAnimalsCattleLiverMaleRNA-SeqBovine geneticsFeed efficiencyRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID31242854
PMCPMC6593537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.