Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242701›Full record

ReviewGenes2019

Electromagnetic Fields, Genomic Instability and Cancer: A Systems Biological View.

Jonne Naarala, Mikko Kolehmainen, Jukka Juutilainen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonne NaaralaDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FI-70210, Finland. jonne.naarala@uef.fi.
Mikko KolehmainenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, FI-70210, Finland. mikko.kolehmainen@uef.fi.
Jukka Juutilainen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the use of systems biology in understanding the biological effectsof electromagnetic fields, with particular focus on induction of genomic instability and cancer. Weintroduce basic concepts of the dynamical systems theory such as the state space and attractors andthe use of these concepts in understanding the behavior of complex biological systems. We thendiscuss genomic instability in the framework of the dynamical systems theory, and describe thehypothesis that environmentally induced genomic instability corresponds to abnormal attractorstates; large enough environmental perturbations can force the biological system to leave normalevolutionarily optimized attractors (corresponding to normal cell phenotypes) and migrate to lessstable variant attractors. We discuss experimental approaches that can be coupled with theoreticalsystems biology such as testable predictions, derived from the theory and experimental methods,that can be used for measuring the state of the complex biological system. We also reviewpotentially informative studies and make recommendations for further studies.

Indexed as

Systems BiologyElectromagnetic FieldsGenomic InstabilityHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsPhenotypeSystems Theoryattractorcarcinogenesisdynamical systems theoryelectromagnetic fieldsgenomic instabilitystate spacesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31242701
PMCPMC6627294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.