Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242671›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Modelling the Effect of Compliance with Nordic Nutrition Recommendations on Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Mortality in the Nordic Countries.

Sanjib Saha, Jonas Nordström, Irene Mattisson, Peter M Nilsson, Ulf-G Gerdtham

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanjib SahaHealth Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö), Lund University, SE-22381 Lund, Sweden. sanjib.saha@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8649-0773
Jonas NordströmSchool of Economics and Management, Agrifood Economics Centre, Lund University, SE-22007 Lund, Sweden. jonas.nordstrom@agrifood.lu.se.
Irene MattissonNational Food Agency, SE-75126 Uppsala, Sweden. evairene@live.se.
Peter M NilssonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Skane University Hospital, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden. peter.nilsson@med.lu.se.
Ulf-G GerdthamHealth Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö), Lund University, SE-22381 Lund, Sweden. ulf.gerdtham@med.lu.se.

Funding

Swedish Research Council grant number (dnr 2014-646)Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, grant number (dnr 2016-00312)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to estimate the number of deaths attributable to cardiovascular diseases and diet-related cancers that could be prevented or delayed in the Nordic countries, i.e., Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Iceland, if adults adhere to the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR). A sex- and age-group specific epidemiological macro-simulation model was used to estimate the preventable deaths due to the differences between country specific actual intake and recommended intake of changes in food components. Data included in the model are a baseline scenario (actual dietary intake), a counterfactual scenario (recommended intake), and age-and sex-specific mortality for cardiovascular and diet-related cancer diseases, together with the total population risk of a specific year. Monte Carlo analyses with 5000 iterations were performed to produce the 95% uncertainty intervals. The model predicts that Iceland would benefit the most by adhering to the NNR, followed by Finland. In all the Nordic countries, the highest benefit would be achieved by adhering to the fruits and vegetable intakes, except Denmark, where a lower recommended intake of salt would provide the highest benefit. For men, fruits and vegetables could have saved more lives compared to other dietary components for all the Nordic countries, while for women, dietary fiber was the most prominent factor, except in Iceland. The Nordic Council should consider policies for promoting healthy eating according to the needs of each country.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyNutritional StatusNutritive ValueRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolComputer SimulationDietary FiberFemaleDietary Fibercardiovascular diseasesdietary guidelineshealth Benefitmacro simulation modelNordic countriesNordic dietrecommended intake

Identifiers

PMID31242671
PMCPMC6627195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.