Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242650›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates.

Congguang Zhang, Fei Wang, Mengfu Pei, Ling Qiu, Hong Qiang, Yiqing Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Kinetic Model for Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production of Plant Biomass under High Salinity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Establishment of an Automatic Real-Time Monitoring System for Irrigation Water Quality Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Congguang ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. zhang.10047@osu.edu.
Fei WangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. alwaysinholiday@outlook.com.
Mengfu PeiWestern Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. jessehan1994@gmail.com.
Ling QiuCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. xbgzzh@163.com.
Hong QiangWestern Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. qiangh2003@hotmail.com.
Yiqing YaoCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. dzhtyao@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4692-8977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry manure is the main source of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution, and its effective disposal through anaerobic digestion (AD) is of great significance; meanwhile, the high nitrogen content of chicken manure makes it a typical feedstock for anaerobic digestion. The performance of chicken-manure-based AD at gradient organic loading rates (OLRs) in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) was investigated herein. The whole AD process was divided into five stages according to different OLRs, and it lasted for 150 days. The results showed that the biogas yield increased with increasing OLR, which was based on the volatile solids (VS), before reaching up to 11.5 g VS/(L·d), while the methane content was kept relatively stable and maintained at approximately 60%. However, when the VS was further increased to 11.5 g VS/(L·d), the total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), pH, and alkalinity (CaCO

Indexed as

BioreactorsManureAgricultureAmmoniaAnaerobiosisAnimalsBiofuelsChickensMethaneNitrogenAmmoniaBiofuelsManureMethaneNitrogenammonia inhibitionanaerobic digestionchicken manuremicrobial biomass yieldorganic loading rates

Identifiers

PMID31242650
PMCPMC6617338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.