Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Consumers' opinions on warning labels on food packages: A qualitative study in Brazil.

Priscila de Morais Sato, Laís Amaral Mais, Neha Khandpur, Mariana Dimitrov Ulian, Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins, Mariana Tarricone Garcia, Carla Galvão Spinillo, Carlos Felipe Urquizar Rojas, Patrícia Constante Jaime, Fernanda Baeza Scagliusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Health Warnings and Beverage Purchase Behavior: Mediators of Impact.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Policies and strategies to combat obesity in Latin America].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Priscila de Morais SatoCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition (NUPENS), Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9850-6859
Laís Amaral MaisBrazilian Institute for Consumer's Defense (Idec), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neha KhandpurCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition (NUPENS), Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Dimitrov UlianDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula Bortoletto MartinsBrazilian Institute for Consumer's Defense (Idec), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Tarricone GarciaBrazilian Institute for Consumer's Defense (Idec), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla Galvão SpinilloResearch Group of Digital and Information Design, Department of Design, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Carlos Felipe Urquizar RojasResearch Group of Digital and Information Design, Department of Design, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Patrícia Constante JaimeCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition (NUPENS), Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Baeza ScagliusiCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition (NUPENS), Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess consumers' uses of and opinions on the current Brazilian food label and their reaction to the introduction of a front-of-package warning label. We conducted 12 focus groups among a diverse sample of adult consumers, to broadly assess: (1) uses of and perceptions about the current food label, and (2) opinions about implementing a front-of-package warning label to guide food purchases. Data was analyzed with a triangulation of researchers using an exploratory content analysis, which allowed codes to emerge from the data. The frequency of codes across focus groups was compared by gender and socioeconomic status to explore differences by these sociodemographic factors. Codes were divided into six main themes: (1) "Reasons for using food labels"; (2) "Barriers to using food labels"; (3) "Requirements for a new label"; (4) "Perceived influence on consumption behaviors"; (5) "Perceived influence on child behaviors"; and (6) "Perceptions of the food manufacturers using of warning labels". Participants used food labels to check nutrient content and ingredient information but the format of these labels and the technicality of the content displayed often made the information inaccessible, particularly for those with low socioeconomic status. Most participants were supportive of the display of front-of-package warning labels on products and considered them useful to inform purchases. Women believed that they and their children would reduce the consumption of foods with front-of-package warning labels, while men reported more polarity in their intentions. For men and their children, front-of-package warning labels would result in either stopping food intake entirely or continued consumption without changes to the amount. The study results highlight the potential of front-of-package warning labels to support healthier behaviors in both consumers and their children.

Indexed as

Food LabelingAdultBrazilChildChild BehaviorChoice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsFood IndustryFood PreferencesHealth BehaviorHumansMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID31242235
PMCPMC6594644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.