ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Drosophila melanogaster grooming possesses syntax with distinct rules at different temporal scales.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Centralized brain networks controlling antennal grooming coordination.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Linking brain and behavior states in Zebrafish Larvae locomotion using hidden Markov models.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Characterizing the structure of mouse behavior using Motion Sequencing.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- Glial expression of Drosophila UBE3A causes spontaneous seizures that can be modulated by 5-HT signaling.Neurobiology of disease · 2024Article
- Altered Grooming Cycles in Transgenic Drosophila.Behavior genetics · 2024Article
- Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence ineLife · 2024Article
- Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Learning and organization of within-session sequences by pigeons (Columba livia).Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- A lexical approach for identifying behavioural action sequences.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Variation and Variability inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Paired fruit flies synchronize behavior: Uncovering social interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- PiVR: An affordable and versatile closed-loop platform to study unrestrained sensorimotor behavior.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action.Neuron · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical modeling of behavioral sequences yields insight into the rules and mechanisms underlying sequence generation. Grooming in Drosophila melanogaster is characterized by repeated execution of distinct, stereotyped actions in variable order. Experiments demonstrate that, following stimulation by an irritant, grooming progresses gradually from an early phase dominated by anterior cleaning to a later phase with increased walking and posterior cleaning. We also observe that, at an intermediate temporal scale, there is a strong relationship between the amount of time spent performing body-directed grooming actions and leg-directed actions. We then develop a series of data-driven Markov models that isolate and identify the behavioral features governing transitions between individual grooming bouts. We identify action order as the primary driver of probabilistic, but non-random, syntax structure, as has previously been identified. Subsequent models incorporate grooming bout duration, which also contributes significantly to sequence structure. Our results show that, surprisingly, the syntactic rules underlying probabilistic grooming transitions possess action duration-dependent structure, suggesting that sensory input-independent mechanisms guide grooming behavior at short time scales. Finally, the inclusion of a simple rule that modifies grooming transition probabilities over time yields a generative model that recapitulates the key features of observed grooming sequences at several time scales. These discoveries suggest that sensory input guides action selection by modulating internally generated dynamics. Additionally, the discovery of these principles governing grooming in D. melanogaster demonstrates the utility of incorporating temporal information when characterizing the syntax of behavioral sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.