ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019
Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'Substitute' knowledge of results provided through virtual reality enhances motor imagery-based learning.Psychological research · 2026Trial
- Isolating error-based and reward-based learning in a real-world task via gradual perturbations in embodied VR.iScience · 2026Article
- Hypothesis testing governs strategic motor learning.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
- Distinct roles of brain network flexibility in motor learning across age.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- How cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic subnetworks can shift decision policies to increase reward rate.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Error-driven intralimb and interlimb adaptations under asymmetric treadmill and cueing conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Indirect feedback hinders explicit sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The sign of exploration during reward-based motor learning is not independent from trial to trial.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Effective Motor Skill Learning Induces Inverted-U Load-Dependent Activation in Contralateral Pre-Motor and Supplementary Motor Area.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Decomposition of a complex motor skill with precise error feedback and intensive training breaks expertise ceiling.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Integrative neural mechanisms for social communication of learned vocal behavior.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Motor learning in multijoint virtual arm movements with novel kinematics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reinforcement Learning during Locomotion.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Effects of noninvasive neuromodulation targeting the spinal cord on early learning of force control by the digits.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Generalization inFrontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Changes in walking function and neural control following pelvic cancer surgery with reconstruction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Narrowing the coordination solution space during motor learning standardizes individual patterns of search strategy but diversifies learning rates.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Motor exploration, a trial-and-error process in search for better motor outcomes, is known to serve a critical role in motor learning. This is particularly relevant during reinforcement learning, where actions leading to a successful outcome are reinforced while unsuccessful actions are avoided. Although early on motor exploration is beneficial to finding the correct solution, maintaining high levels of exploration later in the learning process might be deleterious. Whether and how the level of exploration changes over the course of reinforcement learning, however, remains poorly understood. Here we evaluated temporal changes in motor exploration while healthy participants learned a reinforcement-based motor task. We defined exploration as the magnitude of trial-to-trial change in movements as a function of whether the preceding trial resulted in success or failure. Participants were required to find the optimal finger-pointing direction using binary feedback of success or failure. We found that the magnitude of exploration gradually increased over time when participants were learning the task. Conversely, exploration remained low in participants who were unable to correctly adjust their pointing direction. Interestingly, exploration remained elevated when participants underwent a second training session, which was associated with faster relearning. These results indicate that the motor system may flexibly upregulate the extent of exploration during reinforcement learning as if acquiring a specific strategy to facilitate subsequent learning. Also, our findings showed that exploration affects reinforcement learning and vice versa, indicating an interactive relationship between them. Reinforcement-based tasks could be used as primers to increase exploratory behavior leading to more efficient subsequent learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.