Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31242063›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning.

Shintaro Uehara, Firas Mawase, Amanda S Therrien, Kendra M Cherry-Allen, Pablo Celnik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Indirect feedback hinders explicit sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Generalization inFrontiers in sports and active living · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shintaro UeharaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-6255-1815
Firas MawaseDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amanda S TherrienDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kendra M Cherry-AllenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pablo CelnikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

Understanding Motor Behavior After StrokeR01HD073147 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CELNIK, PABLO ARIEL · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor exploration, a trial-and-error process in search for better motor outcomes, is known to serve a critical role in motor learning. This is particularly relevant during reinforcement learning, where actions leading to a successful outcome are reinforced while unsuccessful actions are avoided. Although early on motor exploration is beneficial to finding the correct solution, maintaining high levels of exploration later in the learning process might be deleterious. Whether and how the level of exploration changes over the course of reinforcement learning, however, remains poorly understood. Here we evaluated temporal changes in motor exploration while healthy participants learned a reinforcement-based motor task. We defined exploration as the magnitude of trial-to-trial change in movements as a function of whether the preceding trial resulted in success or failure. Participants were required to find the optimal finger-pointing direction using binary feedback of success or failure. We found that the magnitude of exploration gradually increased over time when participants were learning the task. Conversely, exploration remained low in participants who were unable to correctly adjust their pointing direction. Interestingly, exploration remained elevated when participants underwent a second training session, which was associated with faster relearning. These results indicate that the motor system may flexibly upregulate the extent of exploration during reinforcement learning as if acquiring a specific strategy to facilitate subsequent learning. Also, our findings showed that exploration affects reinforcement learning and vice versa, indicating an interactive relationship between them. Reinforcement-based tasks could be used as primers to increase exploratory behavior leading to more efficient subsequent learning.

Indexed as

Practice, PsychologicalReinforcement, PsychologyAdultExploratory BehaviorFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMetacognitionMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultmeta-learningmotor explorationreinforcement learningsavingstrial and error

Identifiers

PMID31242063
PMCPMC6734400
OpenAlexW2954715659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.