ArticleACS nano2019
Quantification of Biomolecular Dynamics Inside Real and Synthetic Nuclear Pore Complexes Using Time-Resolved Atomic Force Microscopy.
Article in ACS nano, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Karyopherins remodel the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex transport barrier.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Deciphering the intrinsically disordered characteristics of the FG-Nups through the lens of polymer physics.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024Review
- Channel width modulates the permeability of DNA origami-based nuclear pore mimics.Science advances · 2024Article
- Channel width modulates the permeability of DNA origami based nuclear pore mimics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Dynamic molecular mechanism of the nuclear pore complex permeability barrier.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Functionalizing DNA origami to investigate and interact with biological systems.Nature reviews. Materials · 2023Article
- Pore performance: artificial nanoscale constructs that mimic the biomolecular transport of the nuclear pore complex.Nanoscale advances · 2022Review
- Function of Nuclear Pore Complexes in Regulation of Plant Defense Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- TopoStats - A program for automated tracing of biomolecules from AFM images.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Physics of the Nuclear Pore Complex: Theory, Modeling and Experiment.Physics reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decades, atomic force microscopy (AFM) has emerged as an increasingly powerful tool to study the dynamics of biomolecules at nanometer length scales. However, the more stochastic the nature of such biomolecular dynamics, the harder it becomes to distinguish them from AFM measurement noise. Rapid, stochastic dynamics are inherent to biological systems comprising intrinsically disordered proteins. One role of such proteins is in the formation of the transport barrier of the nuclear pore complex (NPC): the selective gateway for macromolecular traffic entering or exiting the nucleus. Here, we use AFM to observe the dynamics of intrinsically disordered proteins from two systems: the transport barrier of native NPCs and the transport barrier of a mimetic NPC made using a DNA origami scaffold. Analyzing data recorded with 50-200 ms temporal resolution, we highlight the importance of drift correction and appropriate baseline measurements in such experiments. In addition, we describe an autocorrelation analysis to quantify time scales of observed dynamics and to assess their veracity-an analysis protocol that lends itself to the quantification of stochastic fluctuations in other biomolecular systems. The results reveal the surprisingly slow rate of stochastic, collective transitions inside mimetic NPCs, highlighting the importance of FG-nup cohesive interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.