Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240870›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology reports2019

Effectiveness of high-frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5-minute vs 18.75-minute protocol.

Shinsuke Kito, Midori Miyazi, Honoka Nakatani, Yuki Matsuda, Ryuichi Yamazaki, Tatsuya Okamoto, Yoshio Igarashi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinsuke KitoDepartment of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-1054
Midori MiyaziMedicalcare Toranomon Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Honoka NakataniMedicalcare Toranomon Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki MatsudaDepartment of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7312-1266
Ryuichi YamazakiDepartment of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya OkamotoMedicalcare Toranomon Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshio IgarashiMedicalcare Toranomon Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Toranomon Hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimClinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left prefrontal cortex in treatment-resistant depression. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the conventional 37.5-minute vs 18.75-minute rTMS protocol over the left prefrontal cortex in patients with treatment-resistant depressive episode.

methodsThirty patients with treatment-resistant depression or bipolar disorder depressive episode were randomized 1:1 to either 37.5-minute or 18.75-minute rTMS protocol groups. rTMS treatment was applied at 120% resting motor threshold with 10 Hz over the left prefrontal cortex. Treatment sessions were delivered for a total of 3000 pulses/d, 5 days a week, for 4-6 weeks. Patients received a 75 trains with "4 sec on and 26 sec off" for 37.5 minutes or a 75 trains with "4 sec on and 11 sec off" for 18.75 minutes. Severity of depression was rated with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Remission was defined as a total score of 5 or less on the QIDS. The primary outcome measure was to compare the remission rate between the both groups.

resultsThirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) showed remission at week 6. There were no significant differences in the remission rate between the conventional 37.5- and 18.75-minute protocol groups (46.7% and 40.0%, respectively). No seizures or treatment-emergent mania/hypomania were occurred.

conclusionThese findings suggest that, compared with the conventional one, rTMS with 18.75-minute protocol might be equally effective and clinically beneficial in saving the treatment session length. Further well-designed studies are needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBipolar DisorderDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexSeizuresTranscranial Magnetic StimulationdepressionPHQ-9Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatologyrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationstimulation protocol

Identifiers

PMID31240870
PMCPMC7292276
OpenAlexW2954389384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.