Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology reports2019
Effectiveness of high-frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5-minute vs 18.75-minute protocol.
Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of high-frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: A randomized clinical trial of 37.5-minute vs 18.75-minute protocol.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2019Trial
- Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
- The Use of MRI and TMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Advances in Pediatric Applications.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation for consciousness recovery after traumatic brain injury: a case series.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Resistant Depression: A Scoping Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression: Therapeutic Trends, Challenges and Future Directions.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Review
- Randomized, sham-controlled, clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with Alzheimer's dementia in Japan.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimClinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left prefrontal cortex in treatment-resistant depression. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the conventional 37.5-minute vs 18.75-minute rTMS protocol over the left prefrontal cortex in patients with treatment-resistant depressive episode.
methodsThirty patients with treatment-resistant depression or bipolar disorder depressive episode were randomized 1:1 to either 37.5-minute or 18.75-minute rTMS protocol groups. rTMS treatment was applied at 120% resting motor threshold with 10 Hz over the left prefrontal cortex. Treatment sessions were delivered for a total of 3000 pulses/d, 5 days a week, for 4-6 weeks. Patients received a 75 trains with "4 sec on and 26 sec off" for 37.5 minutes or a 75 trains with "4 sec on and 11 sec off" for 18.75 minutes. Severity of depression was rated with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Remission was defined as a total score of 5 or less on the QIDS. The primary outcome measure was to compare the remission rate between the both groups.
resultsThirteen of 30 patients (43.3%) showed remission at week 6. There were no significant differences in the remission rate between the conventional 37.5- and 18.75-minute protocol groups (46.7% and 40.0%, respectively). No seizures or treatment-emergent mania/hypomania were occurred.
conclusionThese findings suggest that, compared with the conventional one, rTMS with 18.75-minute protocol might be equally effective and clinically beneficial in saving the treatment session length. Further well-designed studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.