Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240719›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2019

Using optically pumped magnetometers to measure magnetoencephalographic signals in the human cerebellum.

Chin-Hsuan Lin, Tim M Tierney, Niall Holmes, Elena Boto, James Leggett, Sven Bestmann, Richard Bowtell, Matthew J Brookes, Gareth R Barnes, R Chris Miall

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chin-Hsuan LinWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-1830
Tim M TierneyWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Niall HolmesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Elena BotoSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
James LeggettSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sven BestmannWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Richard BowtellSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Gareth R BarnesWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
R Chris MiallSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009645/1Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 203257/B/16/ZWellcome Trust 203257/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT212422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsThe application of conventional cryogenic magnetoencephalography (MEG) to the study of cerebellar functions is highly limited because typical cryogenic sensor arrays are far away from the cerebellum and naturalistic movement is not allowed in the recording. A new generation of MEG using optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) that can be worn on the head during movement has opened up an opportunity to image the cerebellar electrophysiological activity non-invasively. We use OPMs to record human cerebellar MEG signals elicited by air-puff stimulation to the eye. We demonstrate robust responses in the cerebellum. OPMs pave the way for studying the neurophysiology of the human cerebellum. ABSTRACT: We test the feasibility of an optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalographic (OP-MEG) system for the measurement of human cerebellar activity. This is to our knowledge the first study investigating the human cerebellar electrophysiology using optically pumped magnetometers. As a proof of principle, we use an air-puff stimulus to the eyeball in order to elicit cerebellar activity that is well characterized in non-human models. In three subjects, we observe an evoked component at approx. 50 ms post-stimulus, followed by a second component at approx. 85-115 ms post-stimulus. Source inversion localizes both components in the cerebellum, while control experiments exclude potential sources elsewhere. We also assess the induced oscillations, with time-frequency decompositions, and identify additional sources in the occipital lobe, a region expected to be active in our paradigm, and in the neck muscles. Neither of these contributes to the stimulus-evoked responses at 50-115 ms. We conclude that OP-MEG technology offers a promising way to advance the understanding of the information processing mechanisms in the human cerebellum.

Indexed as

MagnetoencephalographyAdultBlinkingCerebellumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcerebellumeyeblink conditioningmagnetoencephalographyoptically pumped magnetometer

Identifiers

PMID31240719
PMCPMC6767854
OpenAlexW2954934460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.