Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240565›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

Mapping articulatory and grammatical subcomponents of fluency deficits in post-stroke aphasia.

Daniel Mirman, Amanda E Kraft, Denise Y Harvey, Adelyn R Brecher, Myrna F Schwartz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel MirmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. dan@danmirman.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5472-0220
Amanda E KraftDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Denise Y HarveyMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Adelyn R BrecherMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Myrna F SchwartzMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
Moss Rehabilitation Hospital · USLockheed Martin (United States) · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Psycholinguistic Anaylsis of Aphasic SyndromesR01DC000191 · NIDCD · TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, MYRNA F · 1989 to 2015
$9.8M
Postdoctoral Training in Translational Neurorehabilitation ResearchT32HD071844 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI WHYTE, JOHN · 2013 to 2022
$2.2M
Dynamics of Spoken Word Comprehension in AphasiaR01DC010805 · NIDCD · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI MIRMAN, DANIEL · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD071844NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000191NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluent speech production is a critical aspect of language processing and is central to aphasia diagnosis and treatment. Multiple cognitive processes and neural subsystems must be coordinated to produce fluent narrative speech. To refine the understanding of these systems, measures that minimize the influence of other cognitive processes were defined for articulatory deficits and grammatical deficits. Articulatory deficits were measured by the proportion of phonetic errors (articulatory and prosodic) in a word repetition task in 115 participants with aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. Grammatical deficits were assessed in 46 participants based on two measures-proportion of closed class words and proportion of words in sentences-generated during semistructured narrative speech production (telling the Cinderella story). These measures were used to identify brain regions critical for articulatory and grammatical aspects of speech production using a multivariate lesion-symptom mapping approach based on support vector regression. Phonetic error proportion was associated with damage to the postcentral gyrus and the inferior parietal lobule (particularly the supramarginal gyrus). Proportion of closed class words in narrative speech did not have consistent lesion correlates. Proportion of words in sentences was strongly associated with frontal lobe damage, particularly the inferior and middle frontal gyri. Grammatical sentence structuring relies on frontal regions, particularly the inferior and middle frontal gyri, whereas phonetic-articulatory planning and execution relies on parietal regions, particularly the postcentral and supramarginal gyri. These results clarify and extend current understanding of the functional components of the frontoparietal speech production system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAphasiaBrainFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhoneticsSpeechStrokeAphasiaFluencyLesion-symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID31240565
PMCPMC6786948
OpenAlexW2954363594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.