Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240564›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2019

Clinical and anorectal manometry profile of patients with functional constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Omesh Goyal, Monika Bansal, Ajit Sood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. High-resolution anorectal manometry in chronic constipation-Defining dysfunction beyond diagnosis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. High-resolution anorectal manometry profile in patients with chronic constipation versus control.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  4. What is new in Rome V?: Redefining diagnostic criteria and clinical pathways in disorders of gut-brain interaction.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The road to Rome IV and beyond: Evolution, refinements and future considerations for the Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral Intervention in Children with Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders: A Promising Option.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omesh GoyalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Civil Lines, Tagore Nagar, Ludhiana 141 001, India. goyalomesh@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6347-0988
Monika BansalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Civil Lines, Tagore Nagar, Ludhiana 141 001, India.
Ajit SoodDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Civil Lines, Tagore Nagar, Ludhiana 141 001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional constipation (FC) and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) have significant healthcare impact. Clinical and investigative data of patients with these disorders in Indian population is scarce. We aimed to compare the clinical and anorectal manometric profile of patients with FC and IBS-C.

methodsConsecutive patients with chronic constipation undergoing anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET) were enrolled. Thirty healthy volunteers served as controls (HC). Functional defecatory disorder (FDD) was diagnosed according to ROME IV criteria if both ARM and BET were abnormal.

resultsOf the 231 patients enrolled (median age 47 years, 87.8% males), FC and IBS-C were diagnosed in 132 (57.1%) and 99 (42.9%) patients, respectively. Significant clinical differences between FC and IBS-C patients included older age, lower stool frequency/week, higher frequency of straining, and greater frequency  of incomplete evacuation (p < 0.001). ARM revealed abnormal defecatory pattern in 55.3% (n = 73) FC patients and 47.5% (n = 47) IBS-C patients. Of them, 54.7% (40/73) of FC patients had inadequate defecatory propulsion while 89.4% (42/47) of the IBS-C patients had dyssynergic defecation (p < 0.001). Abnormal BET was seen in 67.4% of FC patients and 43.4% of IBS-C patients. Thus, FDD was diagnosed in 55.3% and 46.5% of FC and IBS-C patients, respectively. Rectal hyposensitivity was present in 60.6% of FC patients compared with 2% of IBS-C patients (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThere were significant differences in clinical and manometric profile of FC and IBS-C patients. Compared with IBS-C patients, FC patients were older, had higher prevalence of FDD, less often had dyssynergic defecation, and had higher prevalence of rectal hyposensitivity.

Indexed as

DefecationAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAnal CanalCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseConstipationFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleManometryMiddle AgedRectumAnorectal manometryBalloon expulsion testChronic constipationFunctional constipationIrritable bowel syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.