Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2019
Clinical efficacy and safety of first-line nilotinib therapy and evaluation of the clinical utility of the FRET-based drug sensitivity test.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory Effect of Ginsenoside Rb2 Against Cyclophosphamide-Induced Immunosuppression in Mice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Signaling Microdomains in the Spotlight: Visualizing Compartmentalized Signaling Using Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensors.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nilotinib is widely used for primary treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We previously reported that use of an FRET-based drug sensitivity test at diagnosis efficiently predicts the response to treatment with imatinib or dasatinib. Here, we conducted a phase-II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib treatment and identify useful biomarkers, including results of the FRET-based drug sensitivity test, for predicting treatment response. Data from 42 patients were used in the analysis. Major molecular response (MMR), MR4, and MR4.5 rates at 12 months were 64.3, 42.9, and 28.6%, respectively. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events occurred in 11 patients (26.2%). The dose intensity of nilotinib (> 76.44%) and halving time (HT, < 13.312 days) were identified as significant factors for MMR at 12 months. However, when we focused on patients whose dose intensity of nilotinib was > 76.44%, the FRET-based drug sensitivity test became a predictive factor of MR4 achievement at 12 months. Our study reconfirmed the efficacy and safety of nilotinib treatment in CML patients. Moreover, our results suggest that the FRET-based drug sensitivity test is an independent predictor for achievement of MR4 in patients treated with a sufficient dose intensity of nilotinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31240558What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.