Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240558›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2019

Clinical efficacy and safety of first-line nilotinib therapy and evaluation of the clinical utility of the FRET-based drug sensitivity test.

Takeshi Kondo, Mari Fujioka, Shinichi Fujisawa, Kaori Sato, Masumi Tsuda, Takuto Miyagishima, Akio Mori, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Yasutaka Kakinoki, Satoshi Yamamoto and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Takeshi KondoDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. t-kondoh@med.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-5824
Mari FujiokaDepartment of Cell Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Shinichi FujisawaDivision of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kaori SatoDivision of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Masumi TsudaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takuto MiyagishimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Japan Labour Health and Welfare Organization, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan.
Akio MoriBlood Disorders Center, Aiiku Hospital, S4W25, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 064-0804, Japan.
Hiroshi IwasakiDepartment of Hematology, Hokkaido P.W.F.A.C. Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yasutaka KakinokiDepartment of Hematology, Asahikawa City Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan.
Satoshi YamamotoDepartment of Hematology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshihito HaseyamaDepartment of Hematology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Seisho AndoDepartment of Hematology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Motohiro ShindoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Shuichi OtaDepartment of Hematology, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Mitsutoshi KurosawaDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Yusuke OhbaDepartment of Cell Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takanori TeshimaDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
North Japan Hematology Study Group (NJHSG)

Funding

Japan Society for the Promorion of Science 25461404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nilotinib is widely used for primary treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We previously reported that use of an FRET-based drug sensitivity test at diagnosis efficiently predicts the response to treatment with imatinib or dasatinib. Here, we conducted a phase-II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib treatment and identify useful biomarkers, including results of the FRET-based drug sensitivity test, for predicting treatment response. Data from 42 patients were used in the analysis. Major molecular response (MMR), MR4, and MR4.5 rates at 12 months were 64.3, 42.9, and 28.6%, respectively. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events occurred in 11 patients (26.2%). The dose intensity of nilotinib (> 76.44%) and halving time (HT, < 13.312 days) were identified as significant factors for MMR at 12 months. However, when we focused on patients whose dose intensity of nilotinib was > 76.44%, the FRET-based drug sensitivity test became a predictive factor of MR4 achievement at 12 months. Our study reconfirmed the efficacy and safety of nilotinib treatment in CML patients. Moreover, our results suggest that the FRET-based drug sensitivity test is an independent predictor for achievement of MR4 in patients treated with a sufficient dose intensity of nilotinib.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPyrimidinesAntineoplastic AgentsnilotinibPyrimidinesBCR-ABLChronic myeloid leukemia (CML)Drug sensitivity testFörster resonance energy transfer (FRET)Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.