Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240545›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2020

Bee Venom Immunotherapy: Current Status and Future Directions.

Abida Zahirović, Jernej Luzar, Peter Molek, Nika Kruljec, Mojca Lunder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abida ZahirovićFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. a.zahirovic@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-7553
Jernej LuzarFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Peter MolekFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nika KruljecFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mojca LunderFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Slovenian Research Agency Research programme P4-0127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bee venom immunotherapy is the main treatment option for bee sting allergy. Its major limitations are the high percentage of allergic side effects and long duration, which are driving the development of novel therapeutic modalities. Three general approaches have been evaluated including the use of hypoallergenic allergen derivatives, adjunctive therapy, and alternative delivery routes. This article reviews preclinical and clinical evidence on the therapeutic potential of these new therapies. Among hypoallergenic derivatives, hybrid allergens showed a markedly reduced IgE reactivity in mouse models. Whether they will offer therapeutic benefit over extract, it is still not known since clinical trials have not been carried out yet. T cell epitope peptides have proven effective in small clinical trials. Major histocompatibility complex class II restriction was circumvented by using long overlapping or promiscuous T cell epitope peptides. However, the T cell-mediated late-phase adverse events have been reported with both short and longer peptides. Application of mimotopes could potentially overcome both T cell- and IgE-mediated adverse events. During this evolution of vaccine, there has been a gain in safety. The efficacy was further improved with the use of Toll-like receptor-activating adjuvants and delivery systems. In murine models, the association of allergen Api m 1 with cytosine-guanosine rich oligonucleotides stimulated strong T-helper type-1 response, whereas its encapsulation into microbubbles protected mice against allergen challenge. An intralymphatic administration of low-dose vaccine has shown the potential to decrease treatment from 5 years to only 12 weeks. Bigger clinical trials are needed to follow up on these results.

Indexed as

AllergensAnimalsBeesBee VenomsDesensitization, ImmunologicEpitopesHumansHypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateMiceRecombinant ProteinsT-LymphocytesAllergensBee VenomsEpitopesRecombinant ProteinsBee venom immunotherapyEpitope-based peptideHypoallergenic derivativeRecombinant allergen

Identifiers

PMID31240545
OpenAlexW2953931417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.