Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240541›Full record

Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020

APAP therapy does not improve impaired sleep quality and sympatho-vagal balance: a randomized trial in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and systolic heart failure.

Jens Spiesshoefer, Julia Aries, Alberto Giannoni, Michele Emdin, Henrik Fox, Matthias Boentert, Thomas Bitter, Olaf Oldenburg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens SpiesshoeferRespiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8205-1749
Julia AriesRespiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Alberto GiannoniCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, National Research Council, CNR-Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
Michele EmdinCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, National Research Council, CNR-Regione Toscana, Pisa, Italy.
Henrik FoxClinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Matthias BoentertRespiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Thomas BitterClinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Olaf OldenburgClinic for Cardiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. akleemeyer@hdz-nrw.de.
Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

Resmed, Martinsried, Germany n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the effects of automatic positive airway pressure therapy (APAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on sleep quality and sympatho-vagal balance (SVB) are unknown.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial (6 months of APAP vs. nasal strips as control), sleep quality and SVB in patients with HFrEF and OSA were monitored. The distinction was made between different breathing conditions (5-min segments of OSA or normal breathing [NB] during stable N2 sleep) at baseline (T0), APAP initiation (T1), and 6 months of successful APAP treatment (T2).

resultsOf 75 patients enrolled, 61 were men with average age of 65 ± 12 years and LVEF of 31 ± 9%; 37 patients were randomized into the APAP and 38 into the control (nasal strips only) group. At T0, OSA was associated with a 17% increase in the low-frequency/high-frequency component ratio of heart rate variability (LF/HF) versus baseline, suggesting an increase in sympathetic drive (SVB) with OSA compared with normal breathing. Respiratory indices and oxygen saturation all significantly improved at both T1 and T2, but at 6 months, APAP had no clinically relevant effect on objective sleep quality versus control. In fact, in patients with HFrEF (n = 23 with data suitable for HRV analysis), there was even a trend (p = 0.097) towards an additional 17% increase in LF/HF at T2 in the therapy group, suggesting (undesired) increased SVB in the APAP group.

conclusionTreatment of OSA in patients with systolic HF improves respiratory indices but does not have a favorable effect on sleep quality. While OSA per se was associated with an increase in sympathetic drive, APAP treatment was not associated with a reduction in sympathetic drive. After 6 months of treatment, there was even a trend towards additional increases in sympathetic drive in the APAP group.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationAgedCase-Control StudiesComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Failure, SystolicHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary VentilationSleepSleep Apnea, ObstructiveStroke VolumeSympathetic Nervous SystemHeart rate variabilityObstructive sleep apneaSystolic heart failure

Identifiers

PMID31240541
OpenAlexW2954944423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.