Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240513›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2019

A randomized phase 2 trial of the efficacy and safety of a novel topical povidone-iodine formulation for Cancer therapy-associated Paronychia.

Kara D Capriotti, Milan Anadkat, Jennifer Choi, Benjamin Kaffenberger, Beth McLellan, Samuel Barone, Oluwaseun Kukoyi, Shari Goldfarb, Mario Lacouture

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03207906 (A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Phase-2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Concentrations of VBP-926 Solution for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-associated Paronychia in Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03207906 phase2completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Phase-2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Concentrations of VBP-926 Solution for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-associated Paronychia in Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorVeloce BioPharma LLCRan2017 to 2018Enrolled102ConditionsChemotherapy-Associated ParonychiaArmsVBP-926
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Dermatologic conditions in women receiving systemic cancer therapy.International journal of women's dermatology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kara D CapriottiVeloce BioPharma LLC, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. kcapriotti@velocebiopharma.com.
Milan AnadkatDepartment of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Jennifer ChoiDepartment of Dermatology, Ohio State University Dermatology, Columbus, OH, USA.
Benjamin KaffenbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Beth McLellanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Samuel BaroneVeloce BioPharma LLC, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Oluwaseun KukoyiDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology Service, New York, NY, USA.
Shari GoldfarbDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology Service, New York, NY, USA.
Mario LacoutureDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology Service, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Cancer therapy-associated paronychia (CAP) is a frequent adverse event associated with cytotoxic and targeted therapies that may impact dosing of anticancer therapies and patient quality of life (QoL). There are currently no evidence-based management strategies or approved treatments for CAP. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6 to 8 weeks of 1% or 2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) topical solution versus vehicle-control in adult patients with CAP. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms administered twice daily: 1% PVP-I (Cohort A), 2% PVP-I (Cohort B), or vehicle-control (Cohort C). The primary endpoint was a two-grade reduction (or reduction to grade 0 if involved nails were grade 1) on the six-point Paronychia Severity Grading (PSG) scale. Secondary endpoints included safety and the effect on QoL and microbiota. Results A total of 102 patients with cancer were randomized to the study. In Cohort A, 83 of 205 (40.5%, P = 0.6059) affected nails met the primary endpoint versus Cohort C. In Cohort B, 88 of 167 (52.7%, P = 0.0063) affected nails met the primary endpoint versus 64 of 169 (37.9%) in Cohort C. Nineteen of 29 patients (65.5%) in Cohort B reported moderately or very painful nails at baseline that decreased to 15 patients (51.7%) at visit 2 and five patients (17.2%) at visit 3. Conclusions Treatment with twice-daily topical 2% PVP-I was safe and resulted in improvement in CAP compared with control. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03207906. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03207906.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsParonychiaPovidone-IodineQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsPovidone-IodineAnticancerParonychiaPovidone-iodineQuality of lifeToxicity

Identifiers

PMID31240513
PMCPMC7484976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.