ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2019
The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Management of anastomotic leak after elective anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction model developed on the basis of meta-analysis in the field of medicine: a systematic survey and methodological summaries.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Current evidence on powered versus manual circular staplers in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Pooled it
- Score prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of preoperative and intraoperative colorectal Anastomotic Leak Prediction Scores (ALPS).BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Intraoperative use of fluorescence with indocyanine green reduces anastomotic leak rates in rectal cancer surgery: an individual participant data analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Anastomotic leak and cancer-specific outcomes after curative rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Pooled it
- Short- and Long-term Outcomes of 3-Row Vs 2-Row Circular Staplers for Low Colorectal Anastomosis After Total Mesorectal Excision: A Single-Center, Randomized, Single-Blind, Phase III Trial (THREESTAPLER Study).Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2026Trial
- Comparison of two bundles for reducing surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre cohort study.BJS open · 2024Trial
- Anastomotic reinforcement in rectal surgery: a position statement from an expert panel of colorectal surgeons.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Prevention and management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: evolving trends among Italian surgeons. A SICCR survey.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer with preservation of the left colic artery.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Cytokines at the Crossroads of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Inflammation in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Postoperative Complications.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Predictive Utility of Structured MRI Reporting for Rectal Cancer Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum (PICARR): a decision-making exploring international survey.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage: A single-blind phase III multicentre randomized controlled trial (FLUOCOL-01/FRENCH 21/GRECCAR 19 intergroup trial).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Tailored Strategies to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resections: The Importance of Understanding Risks in Different Patient Subtypes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Comprehensive Single-Center Analysis of Colorectal Anastomoses for Ovarian and Gastrointestinal Cancers.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Transanal repair of anastomotic leakage after oncologic low anterior resection: a prospective cohort.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery is a severe complication associated with poorer oncologic outcome and quality of life. Preoperative assessment of the risk for anastomotic leak is a key component of surgical planning, including the opportunity to create a defunctioning stoma.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify and quantify the risk factors for anastomotic leak to minimize risk by either not restoring bowel continuity or protecting the anastomosis with a temporary diverting stoma.
methodsPotentially relevant studies were identified from the following databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis included studies on transabdominal resection for rectal cancer that reported data about anastomotic leak. The risk for anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery was investigated. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were extracted and used to compare anastomotic leak rates. All variables demonstrating a p value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the risk factors for anastomotic leak.
resultsTwenty-six centers provided individual data on 9735 patients. Selected preoperative covariates (time before surgery, age, gender, smoking, previous abdominal surgery, BMI, diabetes, ASA, hemoglobin level, TNM classification stage, anastomotic distance) were used as independent factors in a logistic regression model with anastomotic leak as dependent variable. With a threshold value of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve corresponding to 0.0791 in the training set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.585 (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of the model's probability > 0.0791 to identify anastomotic leak were 79.1% and 32.9%, respectively. Accuracy of the threshold value was confirmed in the validation set with 77.8% sensitivity and 35.2% specificity.
conclusionsWe trust that, with further refinement using prospective data, this nomogram based on preoperative risk factors may assist surgeons in decision making. The score is now available online ( http://www.real-score.org ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
31240416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.