ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019
Ream and run and total shoulder: patient and shoulder characteristics in five hundred forty-four concurrent cases.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Ream-and-run technique offers equivalent clinical outcomes as anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty but with a high rate of complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with All-Polyethylene Glenoid Component for Primary Osteoarthritis with Glenoid Deficiencies.JB & JS open accessArticle
- Risk Factors for Stiffness Requiring Intervention After Ream-and-Run Arthroplasty.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTotal shoulder (TSA) is commonly used to treat arthritic shoulders with intact rotator cuffs; however, some patients choose a ream and run (RnR) to avoid the potential risks and limitations of a prosthetic glenoid component. Little is known about how patients selecting each of these two procedures compare and contrast.
methodsWe analyzed the patient characteristics, shoulder characteristics, and two year clinical outcomes of 544 patients having RnR or TSA at the same institution during the same six year period.
resultsPatients selecting the RnR were more likely to be male (92.0% vs. 47.0%), younger (58 ± 9 vs. 67 ± 10 years), married (83.2% vs. 66.8%), from outside of our state (51.7% vs. 21.7%), commercially insured (59.1% vs. 25.2%), and to have type B2 glenoids (46.0% vs. 27.8%) as well as greater glenoid retroversion (19 ± 11 vs. 15 ± 11 degrees) (p < .001). The average two year SST score for the RnRs was 10.0 ± 2.6 vs. 9.5 ± 2.7 for the TSAs. The percent of maximum possible improvement (%MPI) for the RnRs averaged 72 ± 39% vs. 73 ± 29% for the TSAs. Patients with work-related shoulder problems had lower two year SSTs and lower %MPIs. Younger patients having TSAs did less well than older patients. Female patients having RnRs did less well than those having TSAs (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis investigation highlights important characteristics of patients selecting the RnR and the TSA for glenohumeral arthritis. Excellent outcomes can be achieved for appropriately selected patients having either procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.