Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240350›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2020

The impact of urinary stone disease and their treatment on patients' quality of life: a qualitative study.

Aditya Raja, Fiona Wood, Hrishi B Joshi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measurements for urolithiasis: a COSMIN-based systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Impact of body mass index on size and composition of urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Kidney stone disease: phenomenological perspectives.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of the FROM-16 in family members of patients receiving advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medical expenses and its determinants in female patients with urological disorder.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mental Health in Non-Oncologic Urology Patients.Health psychology research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aditya RajaSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4778-0596
Fiona WoodSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. woodf@cardiff.ac.uk.
Hrishi B JoshiSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
University Hospital of Wales · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary stone disease is a common, often recurrent disease, that can have a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), often effecting working, productive members of society. The literature lacks data from structured, qualitative research which could give unique insight into patients' HRQoL. The objective is to understand the impact of urinary stone disease and treatments on patients' HRQoL, from patients' and their relatives' perspective using qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Semi-structured interviews and a focus group were used to understand the HRQoL issues of patients with urinary stones disease, covering the American Urology Association index stone categories. Thematic analysis was performed (using qualitative data analysis software). Familial impact was assessed using the family-related outcome measure (FROM-16©). 62 patients with stone disease and interventions (mean age 51, range 19-92) participated. Data collection stopped when data saturation was achieved. Analysis revealed negative impact of stone disease and interventions on the patients' HRQoL, affecting domains of pain, physical symptoms, outlook on life, work/career, change in lifestyle/diet, social life, difficulties of daily living, travel/holiday problems, relationships and family member impact (106 themes grouped under ten broad headings). Sub-group analyses revealed similar impact in either sex, ureteric and renal stone groups. Recurrent stones were associated with work/financial concerns and treatment preferences varied accordingly. Our qualitative study presents detailed insights into the multidimensional impact of urinary calculi and their treatments on various domains of the HRQoL, confirming previous findings and adding new observations. The findings are expected to help in the development of patient-centric measures and communication tools.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSickness Impact ProfileUrinary CalculiYoung AdultBasic researchPatient-reported outcome measureQuality of lifeRenal stonesUreteric stonesUrinary stone diseaseUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID31240350
PMCPMC7220862
OpenAlexW2954622839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.