Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240333›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2019

Status of birth and pregnancy outcome capture in Health Demographic Surveillance Sites in 13 countries.

Peter Waiswa, Joseph Akuze, Cheryl Moyer, Doris Kwesiga, Samuelina Arthur, Osman Sankoh, Paul Welaga, Martin Bangha, Jacques Eminas, Sheru Muuo and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peter WaiswaINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph AkuzeINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda. joseph.waiswa@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8221-902X
Cheryl MoyerINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Doris KwesigaINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Samuelina ArthurINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Osman SankohINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul WelagaINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Martin BanghaINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Jacques EminasINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Sheru MuuoINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Abdhalah ZirabaINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Kate KerberINDEPTH Network Maternal Newborn and Child Health Working Group, Kampala, Uganda.
INDEPTH Network MNCH team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe compared pregnancy identification methods and outcome capture across 31 Health Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) sites in 14 countries in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.

methodsFrom 2009 to 2014, details on the sites and surveillance systems including frequency of update rounds, characteristics of enumerators and interviewers, acceptable respondents were collected and compared across sites.

resultsThe 31 HDSS had a combined population of over 2,905,602 with 165,820 births for the period. Stillbirth rate ranged from 1.9 to 42.6 deaths per 1000 total births and the neonatal mortality rate from 2.6 to 41.6 per 1000 live births. Three quarters (75.3%) of recorded neonatal deaths occurred in the first week of life. The proportion of infant deaths that occurred in the neonatal period ranged from 8 to 83%, with a median of 53%. Sites that registered pregnancies upon locating a live baby in the routine household surveillance round had lower recorded mortality rates.

conclusionsIncreased attention and standardization of pregnancy surveillance and the time of birth will improve data collection and provide platforms for evaluations and availability of data for decision-making with implications for national planning.

Indexed as

AdultAfrica South of the SaharaAsiaBirth RateFemaleForecastingHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMalePopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeStillbirthDemographic Surveillance SitesINDEPTH NetworkMaternal Newborn Child Health Working GroupMortalityNeonatalPerinatal mortalityStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID31240333
PMCPMC6614155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.