ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2019
Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Lagrangian Wall Strain in Relation to Cardiovascular Risk Factors Using Ultrasound.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Lumen segmentation using a Mask R-CNN in carotid arteries with stenotic atherosclerotic plaque.Ultrasonics · 2024Article
- In Vivo Adaptive Bayesian Regularized Lagrangian Carotid Strain Imaging for Murine Carotid Arteries and Its Associations With Histological Findings.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- Strain estimation in aortic roots from 4D echocardiographic images using medial modeling and deformable registration.Medical image analysis · 2023Article
- Attenuation Coefficient Parameter Computations for Tissue Composition Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque in Vivo.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carotid plaque rupture can result in stroke or transient ischemic attack that can be devastating for patients. Ultrasound strain imaging provides a noninvasive method to identify unstable plaque likely to rupture. Axial, lateral and shear strains in carotid plaque have been shown to be linked to carotid plaque instability. Recently, there has been interest in using principal strains, which do not depend on angle of insonification of the carotid artery for quantifying instability in plaque along the longitudinal view. In this work relationships between angle dependent axial, lateral and shear strain along with axis independent principal strains are compared. Three strain indices were defined, 1) Average Mean Strain (AMS), 2) Maximum Mean Strain (MMS) and 3) Mean Standard Deviation (MSD) to identify relationships between these five strain image types in a group of 76 i
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.