ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2017
Clinical Examination and Reporting of a Victim of Torture.
Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The role of forensic imaging in the allegations of torture in asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Refugees who are survivors of torture.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- The migrant experience through the lens of forensic medicine: the multifaceted utility of asylum applicants' medico-legal narratives and forensic evidence analysed over time.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Treating dental anxiety for patients with a trauma history or severe dental anxiety: A scoping review.European journal of oral sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2017
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Torture is the most inhuman form of punishment. Forensic practitioners should be aware of the common forms of torture, their presentation, and the after effects. Forensic practitioners should examine victims and issue an impartial report to serve mankind in accordance with the United Nations organization. Clinical forensic medicine is the application of medical knowledge for the assessment of injuries in living persons for the purposes of administering justice. Unfortunately, the forensic examination of living individuals is a comparatively neglected field of forensic practice in some countries. In this article, common presentations of torture in the clinical forensic medicine setting are discussed, with special attention to physical forms of torture, common presentations, after effects of torture, and recognizing the difficulties encountered by refugee claims of torture victims. We also describe how to examine and report a victim of torture in clinical forensic medicine. It is a known fact that some of the refugee claimants who come before the refugee claim board have been subjected to torture. They are walking reminders of the worst ways people can treat to fellow human beings. It is sad to see some doctors still participate or collaborate with perpetrators and at the same time there are some reported cases of physicians being imprisoned due to reporting of torture victims in certain countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.