Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239917›Full record

ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2016

The Role of the Anthropologist in the Application of NamUs.

Emily Craig

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emily CraigUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center - National Missing and Unidentified Person System.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Missing and Unidentified Person System (NamUs) provides a web-based platform where forensic scientists, law enforcement investigators, and the public can share information related to missing person and unidentified decedent cases across the United States. Through this secure online database, forensic anthropologists, along with medical examiners, coroners, law enforcement officers, family members of missing persons, and concerned citizens, can access varying levels of information on a common platform to assist in the resolution of these cases. Conventional wisdom and experience allows that an individual who is known within the community and has been dead a very short time is more likely to be identified than someone who is badly decomposed and/or skeletal. For others, even when there has been an extended postmortem interval, circumstances, associated evidence, and location of the remains are just some of the elements that direct the investigation and help establish the identity of the decedent. When the remains are degraded by factors such as extended postmortem interval, mechanical disruption, scattering, or burning, however, the identification becomes much more difficult. In the first week of May 2016, there were 10 767 open cases of unidentified remains in NamUs. Of these, 7257 were classified as unrecognizable by a variety of aforementioned factors. By the very nature of their work, anthropologists can develop key pieces of information from decomposed and/or skeletal elements and NamUs can provide the technology to consolidate and share their findings as well as those of all subject matter experts involved with the investigation.

Indexed as

Forensic anthropologyForensic pathologyMissing personsNamUsUnidentified remains

Identifiers

PMID31239917
PMCPMC6474548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.