ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2016
Evolution of Forensic Anthropological Methods of Identification.
Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human identification through forensic skeletal analysis: three case reviews.Forensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Estimation of Sex From the Buccolingual Dimension of Tooth Among the North Indian Population.Cureus · 2024Article
- Human identification: a review of methods employed within an Australian coronial death investigation system.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- The Forensic Anthropologist in the Mass Fatality Context.Academic forensic pathology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2017
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic identification of human remains has long been a core contribution of forensic anthropologists to death investigations. The array and scientific robusticity of the identification methods employed by the anthropologist has evolved in the last several decades, and as with other nonidentification methods, anthropologists have embraced the progression toward the use of validated and statistically defensible methods for identification. This article presents an overview of the role that the forensic anthropologist plays in the identification of human remains and the evolution of anthropological methods of identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.