ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2016
The Certification of Fatalities Related to Diabetes Mellitus: A Shot in the Dark?
Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological and demographic trends and projections in global health from 1970 to 2050: a descriptive analysis from the third Lancet Commission on Investing in Health, Global Health 2050.Lancet (London, England) · 2025Article
- Adult mortality from non-communicable diseases in Fiji's major ethnic groups 2013-17.Global epidemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2017
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, an estimated 415 million people have diabetes mellitus, which results in extensive morbidity and mortality. In order to track the effect of diabetes on mortality statistics, deaths in which diabetes mellitus caused or contributed to death must be recognized, included on the death certificate, and then properly coded for vital statistic purposes. For public health policy, this will help determine the extent of the disease and follow whether deaths increase or decrease. There is variation among death certifiers for when and how diabetes is included on the death certificate and among vital records bureaus as how to code diabetes-related deaths. Case scenarios are presented to highlight the certification issues that arise with deaths related to diabetes mellitus. This area of death certification may benefit from a consensus effort to standardize and enhance certification and coding of deaths due to diabetes in order to improve the reliability of these mortality statistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.