Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239888›Full record

ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2016

Death Investigation of Diabetes Mellitus: Scene Investigation and Interrogation of Technology.

Maura DeJoseph, Eric Hoppa

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insulin-Related Suicides-3 Cases.Academic forensic pathology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maura DeJosephState of Connecticut Office of Chief Medical Examiner.
Eric HoppaConnecticut Children's Medical Center - Division of Emergency Medicine.
Office of Chief Medical Examiner · USShuttle Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects millions of Americans and is a common cause of death. The medical examiner/coroner (ME/C) may be called to investigate the death of a person with DM due to the possibility of a suicide, accident, or even homicide that relates to the treatment or lack of treatment of the disease. The ME/C can ellicit abundant circumstantial information from a death scene investigation and interrogation of devices such as glucometers, insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and insulin injector pens used for the management of diabetes. These devices contain stored information that can very powerfully assist the ME/C in determining the cause and manner of death. This article provides a review of DM treatment and common medical devices used in the treatment and management of DM, offers the ME/C some instruction for interrogating the devices on their own, and highlights the benefits of beholding the information contained within the devices. At the conclusion of this review, the reader should have an understanding of how these devices work, how the information they contain can be accessed, and how useful that information can be in death investigation.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusForensic pathologyGlucometerInsulin pumpMedical device interrogation

Identifiers

PMID31239888
PMCPMC6507006
OpenAlexW2810449649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.