ReviewAcademic forensic pathology2016
A Brief History of the Literature on Postmortem Changes to the 19th Century.
Review in Academic forensic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'The Choice of Places to dwell in': Lord Bacon's controlled experiments on 'putrefaction' and 'the Disposition of the Aire' (pre-1626).Journal of medical biography · 2026Article
- Review
- Forensic Pluralism and the Dead Body in Early 20th-Century China.Academic forensic pathology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2017
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fact that the body changes following death must have been known for the whole history of mankind. But myth and superstition surrounded the changes. This led to such entities as the ordeal of the bier being used as criminal proof, even though other forms of trial by ordeal had long been abandoned. The scientific literature in the English language did not start until the late 18th century and was still surrounded with ignorance and some superstition. The main concern of the early writers was the correct determination of death. In the 19th century, an understanding of postmortem changes developed and the first attempts to accurately classify sequences of putrefaction were made. This paper analyzes the early forensic medicine writing and the progress of knowledge to the later 19th century, through examination of forensic medicine textbooks published in the English language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.