Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239859›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Ethnobotanical Study of Cultivated Plants in Kaišiadorys District, Lithuania: Possible Trends for New Herbal Based Medicines.

Zivile Pranskuniene, Kristina Ratkeviciute, Zenona Simaitiene, Andrius Pranskunas, Jurga Bernatoniene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Comparative Study of Useful Compounds Extracted fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ethnopharmacology for Skin Diseases and Cosmetics during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lithuania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zivile PranskunieneDepartment of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-1677
Kristina RatkeviciuteDepartment of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Zenona SimaitieneThe Museum of History of Lithuanian Medicine and Pharmacy, Lithuania.
Andrius PranskunasDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-9984
Jurga BernatonieneDepartment of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-0305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the growing body of ethnobotanical studies in Europe, publications are scarce in Lithuania. Ethnobotanical study in Kaišiadorys district is one of the few from this field done in Lithuania. Lithuania is divided into five ethnographic regions, and Kaišiadorys district is an area which borders with the three of them (Aukštaitija, Dzūkija, and Suvalkija), which determines the ethnographic distinctiveness of the area. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of cultivated medicinal plants, their families and pharmaceutical forms used in Kaišiadorys district, Lithuania, and to assess the conformity of medicinal plant materials used by respondents with the recommendations for medicinal plant materials in the World Health Organization monographs.

methodsThe field work was conducted in periods of time from July 2016 to October 2017. During this ethnobotanical research, 30 people were interviewed, 25 of whom agreed to communicate. The average age of respondents was 65 years. Information was collected using semistructured and structured interviews. The obtained information was recorded indicating ethnic names of plants, their preparation techniques, parts used, modes of administration, and application for therapeutic purposes.

resultsRespondents mentioned 71 species of cultivated medicinal plants from 38 families, used for therapeutic purposes and indicated which parts of the plant they use, how they prepare them, indications for use, and ways of administration. The most commonly cited families were Asteraceae (20.5%), Lamiaceae (13.9%), and Apiaceae (12.8%); most popular plants, cited more than 20 times, were

conclusionsOnly 19 of the cultivated medicinal plant species mentioned by interviewed persons are described in the World Health Organization monographs. This means that the remaining 52 species are used without the World Health Organization approved medical indications, based solely on the folk medicine knowledge and experience. This study showed that the folk use of plants is strongly rooted in daily practice in the studied area.

Identifiers

PMID31239859
PMCPMC6556360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.