ReviewReviews in urology2019
Skin Grafting Applications in Urology.
Review in Reviews in urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconstruction of high-grade post-circumcision penile injuries using fenestrated skin and oral mucosa grafts for glans resurfacing: a single-center experience.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Review
- Double-opposing negative pressure dressing-a useful method for splinting skin grafts on the penile shaft.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Managing Thermal Injuries of the Penis and Scrotum: A Narrative Review.European burn journal · 2023Review
- A Retrospective Case Series in Fournier's Disease: And Its Emergency Management et Grafting Technique for Penis Coverage.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Meshed Versus Sheet Skin Graft for Scrotum and Perineal Skin Loss: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Cureus · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Extent of Primary Buccal Mucosal Graft Contracture in Augmentation Urethroplasty for Stricture Urethra: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Healthcare Centre.Advances in urology · 2021Article
- Algorithm of rational approach to reconstruction in Fournier's disease.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2021Article
- [Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa in the genitoanal region].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020Review
- A Case Series of Penile Skin Grafting in Children.European journal of pediatric surgery reports · 2020Article
- Skin burns in Saudi Arabia: causes, management, outcomes and quality of life after skin burns.International journal of burns and trauma · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin grafting is a closure technique widely used in plastic surgery. Urologists may encounter patients with diseases that lead to severe tissue loss due to infection, trauma, burns, malignancy, skin maladies, or primary lymphedema. The development and study of skin harvesting techniques to manage tissue coverage of burns has allowed for great advances and the widening application of skin grafting. As such, there is a growing recognition and application of skin grafts within urology. The aim of surgical treatment and skin grafting within urology is to preserve genital function, improve quality of life, and restore cosmetic damage. In addition to basic technique, this article reviews specific surgical methods employed in reconstruction for patients with Fournier gangrene, buried penis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. Urologists must be aware of these techniques in order to provide adequate counseling for patients considering these operations and when encountering complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31239824PMC6585185W2978528461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.