Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239590›Full record

ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2019

Experimental study of coil delivery wire insertion force in intracranial aneurysm embolization: force discrepancy generated inside the microcatheter through that coil delivery wire passes.

Kazunori Shintai, Noriaki Matsubara, Takashi Izumi, Shigeru Miyachi, Hiroyuki Yamada, Naoki Marui, Toshihiko Wakabayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Is a small coil more effective as a finishing coil for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms? Outcomes using GALAXY G3™ MINI micro-coils as finishing coils in a single center.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Avenir® vs. AxiumFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kazunori ShintaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, JAPAN.
Noriaki MatsubaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, JAPAN.
Takashi IzumiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, JAPAN.
Shigeru MiyachiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, JAPAN.
Hiroyuki YamadaNew Product Development R&D Center, NTN Corporation, Iwata, JAPAN.
Naoki MaruiNew Product Development R&D Center, NTN Corporation, Iwata, JAPAN.
Toshihiko WakabayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, JAPAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In endovascular coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, as coils are filled in the aneurysm and the stage of procedure is advanced, the force to push forward the coil delivery wire (insertion force) increases. However, the coil insertion force that interventionist's felt at his fingertips does not directly reflect the stress of the aneurysm and is affected by the resistance generated inside the microcatheter through that the wire passes. The authors evaluated this force discrepancy by subtracting the loading force at the tip of delivery wire from the insertion force of delivery wire and examined the relationship among them. Experiments were performed with the device that applies a constant loading force to the delivery wire tip with the coil removed. A force gauge was connected to the end-tip of the delivery wire to measure the insertion force. The force was measured by changing delivery wire in different coil brands and the conditions of microcatheter (straight or bent position). The results demonstrated that force discrepancy generated inside the microcatheter increased as the loading force increased in a linear relationship. Different coil delivery wires produced differences in the way that force discrepancy changed, thus reflecting the properties of each wire. Microcatheters with more curvature were associated with a higher force discrepancy. In conclusions, as the loading force increases, the force discrepancy increases, and it means that the coil insertion force that the interventionist feels at his fingertips also increases. This force discrepancy is impacted by the delivery wire properties and microcatheter curvature.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansIntracranial Aneurysmcoil delivery wireembolizationinsertion forceintracranial aneurysmmicrocatheter

Identifiers

PMID31239590
PMCPMC6556459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.