ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2019
Experimental study of coil delivery wire insertion force in intracranial aneurysm embolization: force discrepancy generated inside the microcatheter through that coil delivery wire passes.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Vessel Curvature and Microcatheter-Detachable Coil Compatibility in Arterial Coil Embolization.Cureus · 2025Article
- Is a small coil more effective as a finishing coil for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms? Outcomes using GALAXY G3™ MINI micro-coils as finishing coils in a single center.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021Article
- Avenir® vs. AxiumFrontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In endovascular coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms, as coils are filled in the aneurysm and the stage of procedure is advanced, the force to push forward the coil delivery wire (insertion force) increases. However, the coil insertion force that interventionist's felt at his fingertips does not directly reflect the stress of the aneurysm and is affected by the resistance generated inside the microcatheter through that the wire passes. The authors evaluated this force discrepancy by subtracting the loading force at the tip of delivery wire from the insertion force of delivery wire and examined the relationship among them. Experiments were performed with the device that applies a constant loading force to the delivery wire tip with the coil removed. A force gauge was connected to the end-tip of the delivery wire to measure the insertion force. The force was measured by changing delivery wire in different coil brands and the conditions of microcatheter (straight or bent position). The results demonstrated that force discrepancy generated inside the microcatheter increased as the loading force increased in a linear relationship. Different coil delivery wires produced differences in the way that force discrepancy changed, thus reflecting the properties of each wire. Microcatheters with more curvature were associated with a higher force discrepancy. In conclusions, as the loading force increases, the force discrepancy increases, and it means that the coil insertion force that the interventionist feels at his fingertips also increases. This force discrepancy is impacted by the delivery wire properties and microcatheter curvature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.