ArticleScientific reports2019
Genome-wide analysis of genetic variations between dominant and recessive NILs of glanded and glandless cottons.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chemical Composition and Thermogravimetric Behaviors of Glanded and Glandless Cottonseed Kernels.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cotton is an important economic crop in worldwide. It produces fiber for the textile industry and provides cottonseeds with high-quality protein and oil. However, the presence of gossypol limits the utilization of cottonseed. Two pairs of cotton near isogenic lines (NILs) with different pigment glands, i.e., Coker 312 vs Coker 312 W and CCRI12 vs CCRI12W, exhibit different gossypol contents. The glandless traits of Coker 312 W and CCRI12W are controlled by recessive and dominant genes, respectively. However, knowledge regarding the genomic variations in the NILs is limited. Therefore, the NILs genomes were resequenced and the sequencing depths were greater than 34×. Compared with the TM-1 genome, numerous SNPs, Indels, SVs, and CNVs were discovered. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that genes with SNPs and Indels from the recessive NILs and genes with Indels from the dominant NILs shared only one enriched pathway, i.e., the sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis pathway, which is relevant to gossypol biosynthesis. Expression analysis revealed that key genes with variations that participate in the gossypol biosynthesis and pigment gland formation pathways had different expression patterns among the dominant, recessive glandless and glanded plants. The expression levels in the glanded organs were higher than those in their NILs. Altogether, our results provide deeper insight into cotton NILs with different pigment glands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.